A legal analysis on how France, Germany, the European Union and South Africa responded to the United Nations guiding principles on business and human rights

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Botha, Monray Marsellus
dc.contributor.advisor Botha, M.M.
dc.contributor.postgraduate Buis, Jeanette
dc.date.accessioned 2023-11-29T07:10:06Z
dc.date.available 2023-11-29T07:10:06Z
dc.date.created 2023-12-08
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.description Thesis (LLD)--University of Pretoria, 2023. en_US
dc.description.abstract Globally, companies pursue profitability; they want lower prices for the goods they buy and for the services they use. To gain profit and keep their prices low, they contribute to human rights violations and/or the devastation of the environment. The UNGP is the UN unanimously endorsed instrument that encourages states to pass legislation to compel companies to exercise human rights due diligence and to report on their efforts. The United Nations Guiding Principles (UNGP) impose a duty on companies to conduct human rights due diligence that apprises them of possible human rights or environmental risk exposure in their international operations. States have a responsibility to assist those harmed by a company’s activities to seek judicial relief. The UNGP is a soft law instrument but has had a major effect in the field of business and human rights. Though a voluntary obligation, the UNGP has become the reference document and is used by Civil Society Organisations (CSO) to pressure states into passing regulations on business and human rights. In 2016 Germany passed a National Action Plan (NAP) and the Lieferkettensorgfaltspflichtgesetz (Supply Chain Due Diligence Act) in 2021. France passed a Vigilance Law (Loi de Vigilance) in 2017. Additionally, a UN resolution has initiated a treaty-making process, which might lead to an internationally legally binding instrument that will articulate companies’ responsibilities to avoid, mitigate and remedy human rights violations that their activities cause. The South African government’s response to the UNGP has focused on negotiating a legally binding instrument at an intergovernmental level. This research examines three countries’ varying responses to the UNGP, a soft law instrument. In February 2022 the EU Commission published a proposed directive on corporate sustainability due diligence. The proposed EU legislation aims to advance respect for human rights and environmental protection. The goal is to create a level playing field within the European Union which leads to the exploration of the role China plays in a globalised world. China aims to be more than the world's factory and to become a leader in innovation and high-end manufacturing. en_US
dc.description.availability Unrestricted en_US
dc.description.degree LLD (Law) en_US
dc.description.department Mercantile Law en_US
dc.description.faculty Faculty of Laws en_US
dc.description.sdg SDG-08:Decent work and economic growth en_US
dc.identifier.citation * en_US
dc.identifier.other D2023 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/93522
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher University of Pretoria
dc.rights © 2023 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
dc.subject UCTD en_US
dc.subject Corporate social responsibility en_US
dc.subject Mandatory corporate due diligence en_US
dc.subject Corporate governance en_US
dc.subject Human rights due diligence en_US
dc.subject United Nations Guiding Principles en_US
dc.title A legal analysis on how France, Germany, the European Union and South Africa responded to the United Nations guiding principles on business and human rights en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record