We are excited to announce that the repository will soon undergo an upgrade, featuring a new look and feel along with several enhanced features to improve your experience. Please be on the lookout for further updates and announcements regarding the launch date. We appreciate your support and look forward to unveiling the improved platform soon.
dc.contributor.author | Bai, Francesca![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Mazzitelli, Maria![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Silvola, Sofia![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Raumer, Francesca![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Restell, Umberto![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Croce, Davide![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Marchetti, Giulia![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Cattelan, Anna Maria![]() |
|
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-06T13:04:46Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-10-06T13:04:46Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-04-02 | |
dc.description | The study was presented at the 21st Conference of the National Society of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine ‘Congresso Nazionale Società Italiana Malattie Infettive e Tropicali’, 20–23 November 2022, Rome, Italy (Poster PP259). | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVES: Thanks to its long half-life, dalbavancin qualifies as an optimal drug for saving costs. We aimed to assess the cost and effectiveness of dalbavancin versus the standard of care (SoC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thanks to its long half-life, dalbavancin qualifies as an optimal drug for saving costs. We aimed to assess the cost and effectiveness of dalbavancin versus the standard of care (SoC). RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-six of 228 (55.3%) patients received SoC, while 102/228 (44.7%) received dalbavancin. Twenty-seven of the 102 (26.5%) patients received dalbavancin as first-line treatment, 46 (45.1%) as second-line, and 29 (28.4%) as third- or higher-line treatment. Most patients received dalbavancin as monotherapy (62/102; 60.8%). Compared with SoC, dalbavancin was associated with a significant reduction of LOS (5 ± 7.47 days for dalbavancin, 9.2 ± 5.59 days for SoC; P < 0.00001) and with lower mean direct medical costs (3470 ± 2768€ for dalbavancin; 3493 ± 1901€ for SoC; P = 0.9401). LOS was also reduced for first-line dalbavancin, in comparison with second-, third- or higher-line groups, and for dalbavancin monotherapy versus combination therapy. Mean direct medical costs were significantly lower in first-line dalbavancin compared with higher lines, but no cost difference was observed between monotherapy and combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Monotherapy with first-line dalbavancin was confirmed as a promising strategy for ABSSSIs in real-life settings, thanks to its property in reducing LOS and saving direct medical costs. | en_US |
dc.description.department | School of Health Systems and Public Health (SHSPH) | en_US |
dc.description.uri | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/journals/4039 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Francesca Bai, Maria Mazzitelli, Sofia Silvola, Francesca Raumer, Umberto Restelli, Davide Croce, Giulia Marchetti, Anna Maria Cattelan, Cost analysis of dalbavancin versus standard of care for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) in two Italian hospitals, JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance, Volume 5, Issue 2, April 2023, dlad044, https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlad044. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2632-1823 (online) | |
dc.identifier.other | 10.1093/jacamr/dlad044 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/92746 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Oxford University Press | en_US |
dc.rights | © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. | en_US |
dc.subject | Dalbavancin | en_US |
dc.subject | Treatment | en_US |
dc.subject | Infection | en_US |
dc.subject | Costs | en_US |
dc.subject | Effectiveness | en_US |
dc.subject | Standard of care (SoC) | en_US |
dc.subject | SDG-03: Good health and well-being | en_US |
dc.subject | Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) | |
dc.title | Cost analysis of dalbavancin versus standard of care for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) in two Italian hospitals | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |