Teaching and assessing systems thinking in first-year chemistry

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Reynders, Micke
dc.contributor.author Pilcher, Lynne A.
dc.contributor.author Potgieter, Marietjie
dc.date.accessioned 2023-10-03T10:11:17Z
dc.date.issued 2023-03
dc.description SUPPORTING INFORMATION 1 : Chemistry themes and design principles. en_US
dc.description SUPPORTING INFORMATION 2 : Practical activity 1, environmental subsystem. en_US
dc.description SUPPORTING INFORMATION 3 : Practical activity 1, societal subsystem. en_US
dc.description SUPPORTING INFORMATION 4 : Practical activity 1, economic subsystem. en_US
dc.description SUPPORTING INFORMATION 5 : Prior knowledge quiz 1. en_US
dc.description SUPPORTING INFORMATION 6 : Practical activity 2. en_US
dc.description SUPPORTING INFORMATION 7 : Systems knowledge quiz. en_US
dc.description SUPPORTING INFORMATION 8 : Rater training manual and SOCME assessment rubric. en_US
dc.description SUPPORTING INFORMATION 9 : Teaching and Assessing Systems Thinking in first-year Chemistry. en_US
dc.description.abstract Powerful arguments have been made recently to advocate for the introduction of systems thinking in chemistry education to equip graduates to address sustainability challenges. This contribution describes systems thinking activities and an assessment tool that enables meaningful learning in first-year organic chemistry as students engage with the molecular-level foundation and real-world implications of the system under consideration. The activity incorporates concept maps and systems-oriented concept mapping extensions (SOCMEs) as visualization tools to scaffold the development of systems thinking skills. A rubric based on the SOLO taxonomy was designed and used to assess evidence of systems thinking skills demonstrated on SOCMEs. The activity was implemented in a small and a large group of 18 and 219 participants respectively, where findings from both groups are presented. The grading of six SOCMEs by three independent raters proved to be inconsistent at higher thinking SOLO levels, where rater experience was flagged as an area for future improvement to ensure raters are proficient in assessing systems thinking. However, meaningful progress was made to assess the quality of learning. The rubric was an effective tool for formative and low-stakes assessment to drive the teaching and learning of systems thinking in chemistry. en_US
dc.description.department Chemistry en_US
dc.description.embargo 2024-03-01
dc.description.librarian hj2023 en_US
dc.description.sponsorship The National Research Foundation of South Africa, a 2021 UP Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) grant funded by the University Capacity Development Grant of the Department of Higher Education, and a student registration grant from the University of Pretoria. en_US
dc.description.uri http://pubs.acs.org/page/jceda8 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Reynders, M., Pilcher, L.A. & Potgieter, M. 2023, 'Teaching and assessing systems thinking in first-year chemistry', Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 1357-1365, doi : 10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00891. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0021-9584 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 1938-1328 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00891
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/92666
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher American Chemical Society en_US
dc.rights © 2023 American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc. en_US
dc.subject First-year undergraduate en_US
dc.subject General chemistry en_US
dc.subject Organic chemistry en_US
dc.subject Collaborative learning en_US
dc.subject Cooperative learning en_US
dc.subject Testing en_US
dc.subject Assessment en_US
dc.subject Sustainability en_US
dc.subject Systems thinking en_US
dc.subject SDG-04: Quality education en_US
dc.title Teaching and assessing systems thinking in first-year chemistry en_US
dc.type Postprint Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record