dc.contributor.author |
Chitakira, Munyaradzi
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Nhamo, Luxon
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Torquebiau, Emmanuel
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Magidi, James
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Ferguson, Jan Willem Helenus
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Mpandeli, Sylvester
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Mearns, Kevin
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Mabhaudhi, Tafadzwanashe
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2023-08-04T10:29:14Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2023-08-04T10:29:14Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2022-06-08 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Transfrontier Conservation Areas (TFCAs) are critical biodiversity areas for the conservation
and sustainable use of biological and cultural resources while promoting regional peace, cooperation,
and socio-economic development. Sustainable management of TFCAs is dependent on the availability
of an eco-agriculture framework that promotes integrated management of conservation mosaics
in terms of food production, environmental protection or the conservation of natural resources,
and improved human livelihoods. As a developmental framework, eco-agriculture is significantly
influenced by existing legal and governance structures at all levels; this study assessed the impact
of existing legal and governance frameworks on eco-agriculture implementation in the Lubombo
TFCA that cuts across the borders between Mozambique, Eswatini, and South Africa. The assessment
used a mixed research method, including a document review, key informant interviews, and focus
group discussions. Although the three countries have no eco-agriculture policies, biodiversity
practices are directly or indirectly affected by some policies related to environmental protection,
agriculture improvement, and rural development. The assessment found that South Africa has the
most comprehensive policies related to eco-agriculture; Mozambican policies mainly focus on equity
and involvement of disadvantaged social groups, while Eswatini is conspicuous for explicitly making
it the responsibility of each citizen to protect and safeguard the environment. The protection of
conservation areas is critical to preserving natural habitats and ensuring the continued provision
of ecosystem services. The lack of transboundary governance structures results in the Lubombo
TFCA existing as a treaty on paper, as there are no clear processes for transboundary cooperation
and collaboration. |
en_US |
dc.description.department |
Zoology and Entomology |
en_US |
dc.description.librarian |
am2023 |
en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship |
The International Foundation for Science (IFS), the National Research Foundation (South Africa), CIRAD (France), and the University of Pretoria. |
en_US |
dc.description.uri |
https://www.mdpi.com/journal/diversity |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citation |
Chitakira, M.; Nhamo, L.;
Torquebiau, E.; Magidi, J.; Ferguson,
W.; Mpandeli, S.; Mearns, K.;
Mabhaudhi, T. Opportunities to
Improve Eco-Agriculture through
Transboundary Governance in
Transfrontier Conservation Areas.
Diversity 2022, 14, 461. https://DOI.org/10.3390/d14060461. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
1424-2818 (online) |
|
dc.identifier.other |
10.3390/d14060461 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/91800 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
MDPI |
en_US |
dc.rights |
© 2022 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Biodiversity conservation |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Ecosystems |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Sustainable development |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Resource conservation |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Poverty alleviation |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Sustainable livelihoods |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Transfrontier conservation area (TFCA) |
en_US |
dc.subject |
SDG-15: Life on land |
en_US |
dc.title |
Opportunities to improve eco-agriculture through transboundary governance in transfrontier conservation areas |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |