In vitro osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Pepper, Michael S
dc.contributor.coadvisor Durandt, Chrisna
dc.contributor.postgraduate Mollentze, Jamie
dc.date.accessioned 2023-02-09T07:06:51Z
dc.date.available 2023-02-09T07:06:51Z
dc.date.created 2023-04
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.description Dissertation (MSc (Medical Immunology))--University of Pretoria, 2022. en_US
dc.description.abstract The use of adipose-derived stromal/stem cells (ASCs) continues to increase in the field of regenerative medicine and other clinical applications. Adipose tissue can be collected in a less invasive procedure, when compared to bone marrow aspirations, from patients undergoing cosmetic liposuction or abdominoplasty procedures either as an aspirate or as intact tissue. Adipose tissue is seen as medical waste that would otherwise been discarded. ASCs are seen as the one of the most promising stem cell populations for tissue regeneration as they can be harvested with relative ease, can yield large quantities, grow under standard cell culture conditions, differentiate into multiple lineages, and secrete various cytokines. One of the clinical applications of ASCs is their role in enhancement of bone regeneration. To achieve osteogenic differentiation of ASCs, the ASCs are exposed to a differentiation cocktail containing β-glycerophosphate, ascorbate-2-phosphate and dexamethasone. Currently there is no consensus regarding the most optimal osteogenic differentiation medium for in vitro osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs), and the concentrations of the stimulating factors vary amongst published osteogenic induction media. It is for this reason we tested 3 previously published osteogenic differentiation media with varying concentrations of β-glycerophosphate, ascorbate-2-phosphate and dexamethasone. The success of the different differentiation cocktails was assessed using two osteogenic assays namely Alizarin Red S (ARS) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) which were used to quantify the amount of calcified product and ALP enzyme activity respectively. Of the three differentiation media, one differentiation medium that produced the best osteogenic differentiation was chosen for further downstream testing. Foetal bovine serum (FBS) has been the gold standard for medium supplementation when expanding ASCs ex vivo despite the many disadvantages associated with its use, such as batch-to-batch variability, the presence of xenogenic proteins, possibility of zoonotic disease transmission, and ethical concerns regarding animal welfare to name a few. Furthermore, for ASCs to be used in a clinical setting, they need to comply with Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) guidelines, which strongly advise against the use of FBS in clinical-grade cell therapy products. For this reason, researchers and clinicians continue to seek optimal and GMP compliant alternatives to FBS. Human alternatives to FBS will not only overcome FBS-associated disadvantages, but also more accurately mimic the environmental niche thus making the cell therapy product more physiologically compatible and consequently more reliable when applied clinically. The current study explored the use of two human alternatives to FBS namely platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and pooled human platelet lysate (pHPL) for use in osteogenic differentiation of ASCs in vitro. ASCs were expanded and differentiated in medium supplemented with either FBS, PRP or pHPL. Again, the two osteogenic assays, ARS and ALP were used to determine the success of osteogenic differentiation. To examine the kinetics of osteogenic gene expression, RNA was isolated at 4 time points during the differentiation period (days 0, 7, 14 and 21) and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was performed. We found that both human alternatives were superior to FBS supplemented medium in terms of the amount of calcified bone product produced and the rate at which osteogenesis occurred. RT-qPCR data revealed that cells grown in FBS take longer to switch from a proliferative to an osteogenic differentiation state. Results revealed that PRP and pHPL are effective substitutes to FBS when differentiating ASCs into osteoblasts, and that this can effectively be assessed in the therapeutic setting. The aim of this study is to optimize and standardize protocols to differentiate MSCs into osteoblasts. en_US
dc.description.availability Unrestricted en_US
dc.description.degree MSc (Medical Immunology) en_US
dc.description.department Immunology en_US
dc.description.sponsorship The South African Medical Research Council Extramural Unit for Stem Cell Research and Therapy and the Institute for Cellular and Molecular Medicine will fund this project. en_US
dc.identifier.citation * en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.25403/UPresearchdata.22056479 en_US
dc.identifier.other A2023
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/89352
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher University of Pretoria
dc.rights © 2022 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
dc.subject UCTD en_US
dc.subject Mesenchymal stem cells
dc.subject Osteogenic differentiation
dc.subject Adipose-derived stem/stromal cells
dc.subject Human alternative to FBS
dc.subject In vitro osteogenesis
dc.title In vitro osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells en_US
dc.type Dissertation en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record