Unilateral economic sanctions as a tool for human rights accountability : the case of Ethiopia’s suspension from African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) trade preference program

Please be advised that the site will be down for maintenance on Sunday, September 1, 2024, from 08:00 to 18:00, and again on Monday, September 2, 2024, from 08:00 to 09:00. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Killander, Magnus
dc.contributor.coadvisor Akonumbo, Atangcho
dc.contributor.postgraduate Shibru, Henok
dc.date.accessioned 2022-12-07T12:41:51Z
dc.date.available 2022-12-07T12:41:51Z
dc.date.created 2022-12-09
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.description Mini Dissertation (LLM (Human Rights and Democratisation in Africa))--University of Pretoria, 2022. en_US
dc.description.abstract The study examines the effectiveness of Ethiopia’s suspension from AGOA to address the human rights violations in the country. The study adopts a qualitative research method. Data and other literature sources are collected through desk research and analysed using content analysis technique to inform findings and conclusions. The study argues that the US unilateral sanction measure of suspending the country’s benefits under AGOA has been largely ineffectual and, more alarmingly, may have done more harm than good. The Ethiopian suspension from AGOA has impacted the rights and well-being of on the Ethiopian civilian population by deteriorating their living conditions through suspension-induced unemployment and a decline in households’ income for up to a million people who depended on AGOA for their livelihoods. The suspension also rendered debt-financed industry parks ineffective and substantially reduced government revenues and foreign currency earnings. Consequently, the government’s ability to repay the debts accrued to finance the industry parks infrastructure was affected which led the government to seek debt-restructure deals with its creditors. In order to secure the debt restructure deal, the government was forced to take measures such as reduction of fuel subsidies and spending cuts on new infrastructure development. These measures coupled with the economic hardship inflicted by the suspension significantly hampers the country’s capacity to create conditions for the realisation of economic, social and cultural rights. The study recommends an immediate review of US unilateral sanctions policy against Ethiopia because, despite its negative impacts on the rights and well-being of Ethiopian people, the measures have failed to produce significant change. It also recommends that the US should provide incentive for a change of behaviour by setting clear benchmarks that the Ethiopian government can meet and be prepared to restore the benefits once progress has been made towards those benchmarks. en_US
dc.description.availability Unrestricted en_US
dc.description.degree LLM (Human Rights and Democratisation in Africa) en_US
dc.description.department Centre for Human Rights en_US
dc.identifier.citation * en_US
dc.identifier.other D2022 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/88698
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher University of Pretoria
dc.rights © 2022 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
dc.subject UCTD en_US
dc.subject Unilateral economic sanctions en_US
dc.subject African Growth and Opportunity Act en_US
dc.subject Human rights en_US
dc.subject Trade preference program en_US
dc.subject Ethiopia's aid suspension en_US
dc.title Unilateral economic sanctions as a tool for human rights accountability : the case of Ethiopia’s suspension from African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) trade preference program en_US
dc.type Mini Dissertation en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record