The effect of acute sleep extension vs active recovery on post exercise recovery kinetics in rugby union players

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Leduc, Cedric
dc.contributor.author Weaving, Dan
dc.contributor.author Owen, Cameron
dc.contributor.author Ramirez-Lopez, Carlos
dc.contributor.author Chantler, Sarah
dc.contributor.author Aloulou, Anis
dc.contributor.author Tee, Jason C.
dc.contributor.author Jones, Ben
dc.date.accessioned 2022-11-07T11:38:27Z
dc.date.available 2022-11-07T11:38:27Z
dc.date.issued 2022-08-18
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND : Elite rugby players experience poor sleep quality and quantity. This lack of sleep could compromise post-exercise recovery. Therefore, it appears central to encourage sleep in order to improve recovery kinetics. However, the effectiveness of an acute ergogenic strategy such as sleep extension on recovery has yet to be investigated among athletes. AIM : To compare the effects of a single night of sleep extension to an active recovery session (CON) on post-exercise recovery kinetics. METHODS : In a randomised cross-over design, 10 male rugby union players participated in two evening training sessions (19:30) involving collision activity, 7-days apart. After each session, participants either extended their sleep to 10 hours or attended an early morning recovery session (07:30). Prior to (PRE), immediately after (POST 0 hour [h]), 14h (POST 14) and 36h (POST 36) post training, neuromuscular, perceptual and cognitive measures of fatigue were assessed. Objective sleep parameters were monitored two days before the training session and over the two-day recovery period. RESULTS : The training session induced substantial decreases in countermovement jump mean power and wellness across all time points, while heart rate recovery decreased at POST 0 in both conditions. Sleep extension resulted in greater total sleep time (effect size [90% confidence interval]: 5.35 [4.56 to 6.14]) but greater sleep fragmentation than CON (2.85 [2.00 to 3.70]). Between group differences highlight a faster recovery of cognitive performance following sleep extension (-1.53 [-2.33 to -0.74]) at POST 14, while autonomic function (-1.00 [-1.85 to -0.16]) and upper-body neuromuscular function (-0.78 [-1.65 to 0.08]) were better in CON. However, no difference in recovery status between groups was observed at POST 36. CONCLUSION : The main finding of this study suggests that sleep extension could affect cognitive function positively but did not improve neuromuscular function the day after a late exercise bout. en_US
dc.description.department Physiology en_US
dc.description.librarian dm2022 en_US
dc.description.uri http://www.plosone.org en_US
dc.identifier.citation Leduc, C., Weaving, D., Owen, C., Ramirez-Lopez, C., Chantler, S., Aloulou, A. et al. (2022) The effect of acute sleep extension vs active recovery on post exercise recovery kinetics in rugby union players. PLoS One 17(8): e0273026. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273026. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1932-6203 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1371/journal.pone.0273026
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/88170
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Public Library of Science en_US
dc.rights © 2022 Leduc et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. en_US
dc.subject Sports en_US
dc.subject Material fatigue en_US
dc.subject Running en_US
dc.subject Heart rate en_US
dc.subject Fatigue en_US
dc.subject Perception en_US
dc.subject Stroop test en_US
dc.subject Active recovery session en_US
dc.subject Rugby players en_US
dc.subject Sleep quality and quantity en_US
dc.subject Lack of sleep en_US
dc.subject Post-exercise recovery en_US
dc.subject Recovery kinetics en_US
dc.subject Sleep extension en_US
dc.title The effect of acute sleep extension vs active recovery on post exercise recovery kinetics in rugby union players en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record