Caesarean section indications and outcomes at a tertiary level hospital in South Africa

Please be advised that the site will be down for maintenance on Sunday, September 1, 2024, from 08:00 to 18:00, and again on Monday, September 2, 2024, from 08:00 to 09:00. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Rubgega, F.D.
dc.contributor.author Soma-Pillay, Priya
dc.contributor.author Becker, Piet J.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-10-25T08:51:47Z
dc.date.available 2022-10-25T08:51:47Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.description.abstract Caesarean section rates have increased over the past 30 years and there has been lack of understanding of the drivers of these increased rates. The World Health Organisation has recommended the use of the Robson ten group classification as a system for assessing, monitoring, and comparing caesarean section rates at all levels. AIM : The aim of this study was to determine the indications and caesarean section rate at a tertiary referral hospital. METHODS : This was a retrospective analysis of deliveries between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2018 at a tertiary level hospital in Pretoria, South Africa. The Robson’s 10 group classification was used in classifying the caesarean sections. RESULTS : A total of 15 295 deliveries took place during the study period: 6 883 women delivered vaginally (NVD) and 8 412 women by caesarean sections (CS). The average CS rate was 55%. Robson’s 10 Group 5 (all multiparous, ≥1 previous CS, ≥ 37 weeks, single cephalic pregnancy) was the greatest contributor to the CS rate (29%). Most women who delivered were between the ages 20-35yrs (n= 12000, 78.6%), with majority delivering via CS deliveries (n=6616, 55.1%) compared to NVDs (n=5388, 44.9%). The CS rate for women with underlying medical disease was 19% and women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were the largest contributor to this group (n=1241, 14.8%). The caesarean section rate for women classified as a maternal near miss was 69.6%. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of postpartum haemorrhage between women who delivered vaginally NVD (n=173) compared to those who delivered by CS (n=245) p=0.132). CONCLUSION : Strategies to reduce the primary caesarean deliveries and steps to improve VBAC success rates should be considered and implemented. In a tertiary hospital, Robson’s 10 group classification alone does not give a full description of the caesarean section rate; other causes like medical conditions need to be considered. Health care workers should follow local guidelines to reduce the risk of complications related to hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. en_US
dc.description.department Obstetrics and Gynaecology en_US
dc.description.librarian am2022 en_US
dc.description.uri https://journals.co.za/journal/medog en_US
dc.identifier.citation Rubgega, F.D., Soma-Pillay, P., Becker, P. 2021, 'Caesarean section indications and outcomes at a tertiary level hospital in South Africa', Obstetrics and Gynaecology Forum, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 8-11. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1027-9148
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/87934
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher In House Publications en_US
dc.rights © In House Publications en_US
dc.subject Caesarean section en_US
dc.subject Healthcare workers (HCW) en_US
dc.subject World Health Organization (WHO) en_US
dc.subject Tertiary referral hospital en_US
dc.subject Vaginal birth after a prior caesarean delivery (VBAC) en_US
dc.title Caesarean section indications and outcomes at a tertiary level hospital in South Africa en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record