Characterisation of Brucella species and biovars in South Africa between 2008 and 2018 using laboratory diagnostic data

Please be advised that the site will be down for maintenance on Sunday, September 1, 2024, from 08:00 to 18:00, and again on Monday, September 2, 2024, from 08:00 to 09:00. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Matle, Itumeleng
dc.contributor.author Ledwaba, Betty
dc.contributor.author Madiba, Karabelo
dc.contributor.author Makhado, Lavhelesani
dc.contributor.author Jambwa, Kudakwashe
dc.contributor.author Ntushelo, Nombasa
dc.date.accessioned 2022-04-28T11:32:07Z
dc.date.available 2022-04-28T11:32:07Z
dc.date.issued 2021-07
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND: Brucellosis is an infectious zoonotic bacterial disease of humans and other animals. In the Republic of South Africa (RSA), animal brucellosis is widespread and the current available data on the prevalence of this disease rely solely on serological testing. The primary limitation of brucellosis serology is the lack of discriminatory powers to differentiate between Brucella species and biovars as well as the cross-reactivity observed with other Gram-negative bacteria. AIM: The aim of this study was to conduct a retrospective laboratory-based survey on Brucella species and biovars isolated from various animal species in SA between 2008 and 2018. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The isolation of Brucella species and biovar typing was performed using conventional microbiological techniques. Results and Discussion: A total of 963 strains of Brucella species were included in this study with a frequency of detection for B. abortus (n = 883; 91.6%) followed by B. melitensis (n = 42; 4.4%), B. ovis (n = 29; 3.0%) and B. canis (n = 9; 0.9%). Of the 883 strains of B. abortus, 90.1% were typed as B. abortus biovar-1 while 5.7% as B. abortus biovar-2, and 3.3% and 0.5% were B. abortus S19 and B. abortus RB51 vaccine strains, respectively. Among the 42 B. melitensis strains, 71.4% were reported as B. melitensis biovar-1 and 26.2% as B. melitensis biovar-3 while 2.4% was B. melitensis biovar-2. CONCLUSION: A retrospective study, such as this one, provides useful information that can be critical in formulating policies and strategies for the control and eradication of brucellosis in animal populations in RSA. en_US
dc.description.department Veterinary Tropical Diseases en_US
dc.description.librarian pm2022 en_US
dc.description.sponsorship ARC. en_US
dc.description.uri http://www.wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/vms3 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Matle, I., Ledwaba, B., Madiba, K., Makhado, L., Jambwa, K. & Ntushelo, N. Characterisation of Brucella species and biovars in South Africa between 2008 and 2018 using laboratory diagnostic data. Veterinary Medicine and Science 2021;7:1245–1253. https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.483. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2053-1095 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1002/vms3.483
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/84951
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Wiley Open Access en_US
dc.rights © 2021 The Authors. Veterinary Medicine and Science Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License. en_US
dc.subject Brucella species en_US
dc.subject Biovar en_US
dc.subject Retrospective study en_US
dc.subject South Africa (SA) en_US
dc.subject Animal brucellosis en_US
dc.title Characterisation of Brucella species and biovars in South Africa between 2008 and 2018 using laboratory diagnostic data en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record