Social-scientific criticism in Nigerian New Testament scholarship

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Uwaegbute, Kingsley I.
Odo, Damian O.
Ugwu, Collins I.

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

AOSIS

Abstract

The use of the social sciences in the interpretation of the New Testament emerged from the 1970s and has become a standard methodology for interpreting the New Testament. However, it has not been significantly used in the interpretation of the New Testament in Nigeria by biblical scholars. This article discusses what social-scientific criticism is and the need for its application in the interpretation of the New Testament by Nigerian New Testament scholars for a better understanding of the New Testament and the people, beliefs and teachings it presents and contextualisation in the face of changing contexts of Christianity in Nigeria. CONTRIBUTION : As far as we know, this article is the first one written on using social-scientific criticism to interpret the New Testament in the Nigerian context. It therefore contributes to the need for a multidisciplinary approach to interpreting the New Testament in Nigeria in particular and Africa in general. It therefore contributes also on methodological considerations with regard to interpreting the New Testament.

Description

The first version of this article was presented at the International Conference organised by the Faculty of the Social Sciences, University of Nigeria, Nsukka from 10 to 11 July 2019.
This research is part of the research project ‘Africa Platform for NT Scholars’, directed by Prof. Dr Ernest van Eck, Department of New Testament Studies and Related Literature, Faculty of Theology and Religion, University of Pretoria

Keywords

New Testament, Social-scientific criticism, New Testament scholars, Nigeria, Biblical scholars, Christianity

Sustainable Development Goals

Citation

Uwaegbute, K.I., Odo, D.O. & Ugwu, C.I., 2021, ‘Socialscientific criticism in Nigerian New Testament scholarship’, HTS Teologiese Studies/ Theological Studies 77(1), a6394. https://DOI.org/10.4102/hts.v77i1.6394.