The difficult process of applying easy principles : three recent judgments on via ex necessitate

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Scott, Johan (T. Johan)

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

LexisNexis

Abstract

Focuses on two recent sets of facts which are contained in the newest law reports, namely English v CJM Harmse Investments CC (2007 3 SA 415 (N)) and the Supreme Court of Appeal judgment Aventura Ltd v Jackson NO (case no 290/05 of 2006-09-15), available on Legalbrief Judgments) which brings the matter first raised in Jackson v Aventura Limited ([2005] 2 All SA 518 (C)) to an end. An evaluation of each of these judgments against the principles of our modern law in respect of the granting of a way of necessity is made, with specific emphasis on three aspects: firstly, the application of the principle of “ter naaster laage ende minster schade” (Van Leeuwen Censura Forensis 2 14 34: the principle that a way of necessity “must go by the route which is least burdensome and the nearest to the public roads” – Wilhelm v Norton 1935 EDL 143 168) which was of cardinal importance in all the aforementioned judgments; secondly, the rule that the creation of one’s own position of necessity is normally a bar to one’s successfully claiming a via necessitatis, a principle which never arose for discussion in the Aventura case where its application could have had a major impact; and, thirdly, the principle of utilitas praedio which, if considered and applied in the Aventura case, could likewise have effected a different outcome than the one reached by the Supreme Court of Appeal.

Description

Keywords

Via ex necessitate, Judgments

Sustainable Development Goals

Citation

Scott, J 2008, 'The difficult process of applying easy principles : three recent judgments on via ex necessitate', De Jure, vol. 1, no. 41, pp. 164-174. [www.lexisnexis.co.za]