Geochemical and thermodynamic controls in the formation of mineral assemblages from the metamorphic aureole of the Bushveld Complex in the Potgietersrus area
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Please note that UPSpace will be unavailable from Friday, 2 May at 18:00 (South African Time) until Sunday, 4 May at 20:00 due to scheduled system upgrades.
We apologise for any inconvenience this may cause and appreciate your understanding.
Geochemical and thermodynamic controls in the formation of mineral assemblages from the metamorphic aureole of the Bushveld Complex in the Potgietersrus area
The metamorphic aureole of the Bushveld Complex in the Potgietersrus
area was created in a two-stage metamorphic event. In the first
stage which was related to the intrusion of the lower zone magma,
maximum temperatures of 750°C were attained at 1 ,5 kbar pressure.
Pressure estimates are based on the rare cordierite +olivine+
orthopyroxene ± spinel ± quartz assemblage. At lower temperatures
the cordierite + chloritoid assemblage also appears to have been
stable.
Equilibrium temperatures and pressures during the second stage, which
was brought about by the intrusion of more voluminous gabbroic
liquids that gave rise to the upper critical, main and upper zones
were considerably higher at 900°C and 4 to 5 kbar pressure.
Geothermobarometry is based on the garnet+ cordierite + orthopyroxene
+ biotite; clinopyroxene + plagioclase + quartz and cordierite +
spinel ± sillimanite ± corundum ± orthopyroxene ± olivine
assemblages. The temperature dependence of the Mg-Fe exchange
reaction between cordierite and spinel was used as the basis of a
geothermometer calibrated against published data for natural mineral
assemblages. High alumina (44 wt. percent), low silica (36 wt. percent)
and low alkali pelites from the Timeball Hill Formation also
originated during this stage through the removal of about 65 percent
granitic melt from nonnal pelites.
The maximum pressures calculated for the second stage of the metamorphic
event are about 2 kbar higher than the lithostatic pressure that
could have been exercised by the presently exposed succession of
layered- and roof-rocks. This difference can be accounted for by
a direc~ed stress contribution, which there is evidence for in the
form of a large fold in the floor rocks, and by assuming that the
lithostatic pressure during the second stage of the metamorphic
event was about 1 ,0 kbar higher than the value suggested by the
current field relations, brought about by a superincumbent load of
layered rocks.