Consumer acceptance and willingness to pay for instant cereal products with food-to-food fortification in Eldoret, Kenya

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author De Groote, Hugo
dc.contributor.author Mugalavai, Violet
dc.contributor.author Ferruzzi, Mario G.
dc.contributor.author Onkware, Augustino
dc.contributor.author Ayua, Emmanuel
dc.contributor.author Duodu, Kwaku Gyebi
dc.contributor.author Ndegwa, Michael
dc.contributor.author Hamaker, Bruce R.
dc.date.accessioned 2021-10-13T06:41:30Z
dc.date.available 2021-10-13T06:41:30Z
dc.date.issued 2020-06
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND : Maize is the major food staple in East and Southern Africa, where food-processing industries are emerging fast. New low-cost extrusion cookers allow small enterprises to enter the market for processed cereals, including instant, fortified, and flavored products. OBJECTIVE : Assess consumers’ interest and preferences for the new products. METHODS : Consumers (n = 220) in Eldoret, Kenya, were invited to evaluate 4 new cereal products: (1) sifted maize flour mixed with sorghum, (2) instant sifted mixed flour, (3) instant whole flour, and (4) instant whole flour fortified with natural ingredients and to compare them to conventional sifted maize flour, using 2 preparations: stiff porridge (ugali) and soft porridge (uji). These were followed by economic experiments to estimate consumers’ willingness to pay (WTP) for the new products and traits. RESULTS : For ugali, consumers preferred conventional sifted maize flour, while for uji, they appreciated the new products, especially sifted mixed flour (with sorghum) and instant whole mixed flour. Fortification with food-to-food sources was not appreciated, especially for ugali. Comparing WTP for the traits with their production cost showed that mixed, whole, and instant flours were economical, but not fortification. Maize/sorghum mixtures realized a benefit of 24% over conventional maize flour, whole meal 11%, and instant mixtures 5%. CONCLUSIONS : There is a potential market for improved cereal products in Kenya, but more for uji than for ugali, especially with instant, mixed, and whole flour. Acceptable and affordable products, fortified with other foods that are locally available, however, still need to be developed, especially for ugali. en_ZA
dc.description.department Food Science en_ZA
dc.description.librarian hj2021 en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://journals.sagepub.com/home/fnb en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation De Groote H, Mugalavai V, Ferruzzi M, et al. Consumer Acceptance and Willingness to Pay for Instant Cereal Products With Food-to-Food Fortification in Eldoret, Kenya. Food and Nutrition Bulletin. 2020;41(2):224-243. doi:10.1177/0379572119876848. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 0379-5721 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 1564-8265 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1177/0379572119876848
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/82087
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher Sage en_ZA
dc.rights © The Author(s) 2020 en_ZA
dc.subject Consumers en_ZA
dc.subject Maize en_ZA
dc.subject Sorghum en_ZA
dc.subject Instant en_ZA
dc.subject Africa en_ZA
dc.subject Fortified flour en_ZA
dc.subject Cereals en_ZA
dc.subject Willingness to pay (WTP) en_ZA
dc.title Consumer acceptance and willingness to pay for instant cereal products with food-to-food fortification in Eldoret, Kenya en_ZA
dc.type Postprint Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record