We are excited to announce that the repository will soon undergo an upgrade, featuring a new look and feel along with several enhanced features to improve your experience. Please be on the lookout for further updates and announcements regarding the launch date. We appreciate your support and look forward to unveiling the improved platform soon.
dc.contributor.author | Bonthuys, Gideon Johannes![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Van Dijk, Marco![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Cavazzini, Giovanna![]() |
|
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-10-04T11:22:09Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-10-04T11:22:09Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-08-31 | |
dc.description.abstract | Excess pressure within water distribution systems not only increases the risk for water losses through leakages but provides the potential for harnessing excess energy through the installation of energy recovery devices, such as turbines or pump-as-turbines. The e ect of pressure management on leakage reduction in a system has been well documented, and the potential for pressure management through energy recovery devices has seen a growth in popularity over the past decade. Over the past 2 years, the e ect of energy recovery on leakage reduction has started to enter the conversation. With the theoretical potential known, researchers have started to focus on the location of energy recovery devices within water supply and distribution systems and the optimization thereof in terms of specific installation objectives. Due to the instrumental role that both the operating pressure and flow rate plays on both leakage and potential energy, daily variation and fluctuations of these parameters have great influence on the potential energy recovery and subsequent leakage reduction within a water distribution system. This paper presents an enhanced optimization procedure, which incorporates user-defined weighted importance of specific objectives and extended-period simulations into a genetic algorithm, to identify the optimum size and location of potential installations for energy recovery and leakage reduction. The proposed procedure proved to be e ective in identifying more cost-e ective and realistic solutions when compared to the procedure proposed in the literature. | en_ZA |
dc.description.department | Civil Engineering | en_ZA |
dc.description.librarian | am2021 | en_ZA |
dc.description.uri | http://www.mdpi.com/journal/water | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.citation | Bonthuys, G.J., Van Dijk, M. & Cavazzini, G. 2020, 'The optimization of energy recovery device sizes and locations in municipal water distribution systems during extended-period simulation', Water, vol. 12, art. 2447, pp. 1-20. | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn | 2073-4441 (online) | |
dc.identifier.other | 10.3390/w12092447 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/82034 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_ZA |
dc.publisher | MDPI | en_ZA |
dc.rights | © 2020 by the authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Extended-period simulation | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Genetic algorithm | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Energy recovery | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Leakage reduction | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Water distribution | en_ZA |
dc.title | The optimization of energy recovery device sizes and locations in municipal water distribution systems during extended-period simulation | en_ZA |
dc.type | Article | en_ZA |