Three faces of the European Union water initiative : promoting the water framework directive or sustainable development?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Fritsch, Oliver
Benson, David
Adelle, Camilla

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Water Alternatives Network

Abstract

The Water Framework Directive (WFD) not only recast water management practices within the European Union (EU); it also opened a new chapter for the EU’s external ambitions in the field of water. The central vehicle here is the EU Water Initiative (EUWI), a transnational, multi-actor partnership approach that was established in 2002 to support wider United Nations development goals. The EUWI is underpinned by principles such as river basin planning, resource efficiency, and participation, and the WFD serves as a legal and political template for achieving these aims in interested partner countries. This article analyses the implementation of the Initiative in all five partnerships: Africa, China, Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and Central Asia, Latin America, and the Mediterranean; it argues that the Initiative’s origins in sustainable development related global debates led to selective interpretations of water management principles in these diverse social, political and ecological contexts. In short, these five partnerships emphasise different aspects of the three pillars of sustainable development, and their respective interpretations result in the different WFD variants outside of Europe. These patterns, we argue, not only reflect contextual differences but also strategic EU and member state foreign policy imperatives that have influenced how the WFD has been promoted globally.

Description

Keywords

Integrated water resources management, Sustainable development, Water Framework Directive (WFD), EU water initiative (EUWI), European Union (EU)

Sustainable Development Goals

Citation

Fritsch, O., Benson, D., Adelle, C. et al. 2020, 'Three faces of the European Union water initiative : promoting the water framework directive or sustainable development?', Water Alternatives, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 109-730.