Assessing the efficacy of five commonly used snake and gecko repelling agents when applied outdoors

Please be advised that the site will be down for maintenance on Sunday, September 1, 2024, from 08:00 to 18:00, and again on Monday, September 2, 2024, from 08:00 to 09:00. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Keith, Mark
dc.contributor.coadvisor Verburgt, Luke
dc.contributor.coadvisor Abdullahi, Yusuf
dc.contributor.postgraduate Reynecke, Frans
dc.date.accessioned 2021-07-28T10:47:22Z
dc.date.available 2021-07-28T10:47:22Z
dc.date.created 2021-09
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.description Dissertation (MSc (Wildlife Management))--University of Pretoria, 2021. en_ZA
dc.description.abstract Human-snake conflict is increasing because of human expansion. Snakebite envenomation is a neglected disease that accounts for morbidity, mortality, and economic hardship. The effects of snakebite envenomation are most severe in the developing countries of Africa, Asia, Latin America, and Papua New Guinea. The World Health Organization has resolved to address this issue through improved access to and availability of crucial medical care. Prevention of snake-bite envenomation, however, is better than cure. Snake repellents are often used and conse-quently, there is a lucrative market for such products. In South Africa, there are also a variety of “home remedies” believed to repel snakes. The most often cited to be used are geraniums (including Pelargonium spp.), Jeyes Fluid, Condy’s crystals and naphthalene (moth balls). There is also a commercial product called Snake Repel, available in South African retail stores. Despite the widespread use of these agents, no study has assessed the in-field repulsion effi-cacy or chemical persistence of these agents. This thesis presents the first known effort to ad-dress this in the field. Snakes and other reptiles were passively trapped in drift fence funnel trap arrays, while in their natural movement. Sampling was carried out in northern Limpopo Province from December 2018 to February 2019. The effect of the repellents on reptile, snake and lizard abundance and species was assessed using nested analyses of variance. The effect of the repellents on the reptile, snake and lizard community was also assessed using non-metric multidimensional scaling. None of the agents tested displayed greater in-field repulsion efficacy compared to the control, water. This lack of repulsion was evident at both the spe-cies-and community level. Reptile activity levels displayed temporal variation in accordance with their ectothermic nature. The chemical persistence of the agents was also investigated using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Jeyes Fluid Original, Snake Repel and naphthalene demonstrated rapid, continuous decay of initial volatile chemical compound concentrations, which is undesirable in a snake-repelling agent. The rapid dispersion of any potentially snake-repelling volatiles in these supposed remedies would reduce the likelihood of snakes detecting the volatiles and therefore lead to decreased repulsion efficacy. The lack of in-field repulsion efficacy and low chemical persistence displayed by the agents tested in this study indicate that no known traditional or commercial products effectively repel snakes. Thus, alternative methods of snakebite management should be investigated. en_ZA
dc.description.availability Unrestricted en_ZA
dc.description.degree MSc (Wildlife Management) en_ZA
dc.description.department Zoology and Entomology en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorship Rufford Small Grant and Whipplinger Trust Fund en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Reynecke, F. 2021, Assessing the efficacy of five commonly used snake and gecko repelling agents when applied outdoors, MSc dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yyyymmdd http://hdl.handle.net/2263/81025 en_ZA
dc.identifier.other S2021 en_ZA
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/81025
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher University of Pretoria
dc.rights © 2019 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
dc.subject Wildlife Management en_ZA
dc.subject UCTD
dc.title Assessing the efficacy of five commonly used snake and gecko repelling agents when applied outdoors en_ZA
dc.type Dissertation en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record