Laboratory evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia plus panel compared to conventional methods for the identification of bacteria in lower respiratory tract specimens : a prospective cross-sectional study from South Africa

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mitton, Barend C.
dc.contributor.author Rule, Roxanne
dc.contributor.author Said, H.M. (Halima Mohammed)
dc.date.accessioned 2021-06-23T07:45:52Z
dc.date.issued 2021-02
dc.description.abstract Lower respiratory tract infections are important causes of morbidity and mortality. The global increase in antimicrobial resistance necessitates rapid diagnostic assays. The BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia plus (FAPP) panel is a Food and Drug Administration-approved multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay that detects the most important etiological agents of pneumonia and associated antibiotic resistance genes, in approximately 1 hour. This study assessed the diagnostic performance of this assay by comparing it to conventional culture methods in the analysis of 59 lower respiratory tract specimens. The sensitivity and specificity of the FAPP panel for bacterial detection were 92.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80.8% to 97.8%) and 93.8% (95% CI, 91.1% to 95.3%) respectively. For detecting antibiotic resistance, the positive- and negative percent agreement were 100% (95% CI, 81.5% to 100.0%) and 98.5% (95% CI, 216 96.7% to 99.4%) respectively. The FAPP panel was found to be highly accurate in evaluating tracheal aspirate specimens from hospitalized patients. en_ZA
dc.description.department Medical Microbiology en_ZA
dc.description.embargo 2021-10-10
dc.description.librarian hj2021 en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorship BioMérieux en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://www.elsevier.com/locate/diagmicrobio en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Mitton, B., Rule, R. & Said, M. 2021, 'Laboratory evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia plus panel compared to conventional methods for the identification of bacteria in lower respiratory tract specimens : a prospective cross-sectional study from South Africa', Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, vol. 99, no. 2, art. 115236, pp. 1-6. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 0732-8893 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 1879-0070 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115236
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/80548
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher Elsevier en_ZA
dc.rights © 2020 Elsevier Inc.. All rights reserved. Notice : this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. A definitive version was subsequently published in Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, vol. 99, no. 2, art. 115236, pp. 1-6, 2021. doi : 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115236. en_ZA
dc.subject BioFire en_ZA
dc.subject FilmArray Pneumonia plus (FAPP) en_ZA
dc.subject Pneumonia en_ZA
dc.subject Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) en_ZA
dc.subject Infection prevention and control (IPC) en_ZA
dc.subject Multiplex PCR en_ZA
dc.subject Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) en_ZA
dc.subject Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) en_ZA
dc.title Laboratory evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia plus panel compared to conventional methods for the identification of bacteria in lower respiratory tract specimens : a prospective cross-sectional study from South Africa en_ZA
dc.type Postprint Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record