Study design synopsis : bias can cast a dark shadow over studies

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Fosgate, Geoffrey Theodore
dc.date.accessioned 2021-05-24T12:36:54Z
dc.date.issued 2021-03
dc.description.abstract The study of free-living populations is important to generate knowledge related to the epidemiology of disease and other health outcomes. These studies are unable to provide the same level of control as is possible in laboratory studies and thus are susceptible to certain errors. The primary categories of study errors are random and systematic. Random errors cause imprecision and can be quantified using statistical methods including the calculation of confidence intervals. Systematic errors cause bias, which is typically difficult to quantify within the context of an individual study. The three main categories of systematic errors are selection, information, and confounding bias. Selection bias occurs when enrolled animals are not representative of the target population of interest in respect to characteristics important to the primary study objective. Information bias occurs when data collected from enrolled animals deviates from the true value. Information bias is most damaging when errors vary among comparison groups. Both selection and information bias are prevented through the application of good study design procedures. Researchers should select study animals after careful consideration of the primary study objective and desired target population. Investigators can reduce information bias through standardised data collection procedures and the use of blinding. Confounding bias occurs when the measured association between a predictor and an outcome ignores the influential effect of an additional variable. Confounding is common and analysts must implement the appropriate statistical adjustments to reduce the associated bias. All studies will have some errors and biased data with high precision are the most damaging to the validity of study conclusions. Authors can facilitate the critical evaluation of their research by providing text related to the limitations and potential sources of bias within the discussion section of their manuscripts. en_ZA
dc.description.department Production Animal Studies en_ZA
dc.description.embargo 2021-11-01
dc.description.librarian hj2021 en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://www.wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/evj en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Fosgate, G.T. Study design synopsis : bias can cast a dark shadow over studies. Equine Veterinary Journal 2021;53:205–216. http://doi.org/10.1111/evj.13358. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 0425-1644 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 2042-3306 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1111/evj.13358
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/80020
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher Wiley en_ZA
dc.rights © 2020 EVJ Ltd. This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article : Study design synopsis : bias can cast a dark shadow over studies. Equine Veterinary Journal 2021;53:205–216, doi : 10.1111/evj.13358. The definite version is available at : http://www.wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/evj. en_ZA
dc.subject Horse (Equus caballus) en_ZA
dc.subject Confounding en_ZA
dc.subject Epidemiology en_ZA
dc.subject Random error en_ZA
dc.subject Systematic error en_ZA
dc.subject Validity en_ZA
dc.title Study design synopsis : bias can cast a dark shadow over studies en_ZA
dc.type Postprint Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record