Abstract:
Succession is particularly a challenge in African independent Pentecostal churches (AIPCs),
because unlike traditional churches, they do not have a rotation system, which transfers
ministers from one congregation to the next after a specified period. AIPCs refer to churches
that are led by Africans, for Africans, in Africa. Pastors in AIPCs are mostly founders or
long-term serving pastors. The only time they will be succeeded is when they retire, die or
are removed because of a moral failure or incompetence. Succession by death is most
prominent in independent churches, especially in the case of founders. Most founders in
AIPCs do not retire even if they fall sick or fall into moral sin; they remain at the helm of the
church until their last breath. This makes succession difficult especially after the death of
the founder or long-term serving pastor, as a result, succession becomes contentious and
ends up tarnishing the image of the congregation when not properly managed. The aim of
this article is to highlight the challenges of succession in AIPCs and make recommendations
that can help them find solutions to these challenges. Most African independent churches
(AICs) in the South African context fall within a category of churches that Anderson calls
‘African initiated Churches (AICs)’ and the ‘Newer Pentecostal-Charismatic Churches
(NPCs)’. This article will be focusing on those AICs who are Pentecostal in nature, including
NPCs. An interpretive pastoral care methodology of describing, interpreting, normative
formation and practical application is proposed for this article.
CONTRIBUTION: This article’s contribution is to propose to African independent Pentecostal
churches (AIPCs) a pastoral succession model that will enhance a smooth transition from a
predecessor to a successor. The model will also benefit other church groups in their pastoral
successions, particularly when using the proposed pastoral care approach for practical ministry.