Abstract:
Women in legal practice in Zimbabwe are subjected to cultural and structural restrictions in the cause of their work. In this context, the paper argues that
women are not passive recipients of these challenges but come up with mechanisms to
cushion themselves. The paper investigates the strategies employed by women as they
negotiate these debilitating factors. Qualitative in-depth interviews were used with 46
participants who included 38 women and 5 men who were both in practice.
Furthermore, three key informants were interviewed, one from the Law Society of
Zimbabwe (LSZ) and two from the Zimbabwe Women Lawyers Association (ZWLA). The
study demonstrates four broad strategies, namely, pulling out, conceding, social
investment and going against the tide. Findings suggest that due to socio-cultural and
structural constraints, the strategies are overwhelmingly maintaining male hegemonic
tendencies and discriminatory practices in law firms. Therefore, there is need for all
stakeholders including the professional body, law firm partners, men in practice and
spouses to work together if women and men are ever going to have an equal operating
environment in the practice of law in Zimbabwe.
