Public preferences for ecological indicators used in Everglades restoration

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Stainback, G. Andrew
dc.contributor.author Lai, John H.
dc.contributor.author Pienaar, Elizabeth Frances
dc.contributor.author Adam, Damian C.
dc.contributor.author Wiederholt, Ruscena
dc.contributor.author Vorseth, Chloe’
dc.date.accessioned 2020-07-27T09:12:47Z
dc.date.available 2020-07-27T09:12:47Z
dc.date.issued 2020-06
dc.description Data Availability: All relevant data are available at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/9AG7Z. en_ZA
dc.description S1 Table. Comparison between the demographics of the survey sample respondents and the Florida population based on 2010 U.S. Census information. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234051.s001 en_ZA
dc.description S2 Table. Regression results from conditional logit model with willingness to pay estimates. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234051.s002 en_ZA
dc.description.abstract The Everglades is one of the largest wetland ecosystems in the world covering almost 18,000 square miles from central Florida southward to Florida Bay. Over the 20th century, efforts to drain the Everglades for agriculture and development severely damaged the ecosystem so that today roughly 50% of the historic flow of water through the Everglades has been diverted elsewhere. In an attempt to restore the Everglades, the U.S. Congress authorized the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP) in 2000, expected to cost over $16 billion and to take several decades to complete. We used the results from a stated preference choice experiment (SPCE) survey of Florida households to estimate the willingness to pay for several ecological attributes related to CERP performance indicators likely to be impacted by Everglades restoration. We also used a latent class model (LCM) to explore preference heterogeneity among respondents. On average, survey respondents were willing to pay for improvements in all of the attributes included in the survey, namely increased populations of wading birds, American alligators, endangered snail kites, and spotted seatrout, and reduced polluted discharges from Lake Okeechobee to the Caloosahatchee and St. Lucie rivers. Willingness to pay was highest for reduced polluted discharges from Lake Okeechobee. en_ZA
dc.description.department Mammal Research Institute en_ZA
dc.description.librarian hj2020 en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorship The Everglades Foundation en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://www.plosone.org en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Stainback GA, Lai JH, Pienaar EF, Adam DC, Wiederholt R, Vorseth C (2020) Public preferences for ecological indicators used in Everglades restoration. PLoS ONE 15(6): e0234051. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234051. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 1932-6203 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1371/journal.pone.0234051
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/75447
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher Public Library of Science en_ZA
dc.rights © 2020 Stainback et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. en_ZA
dc.subject Everglades en_ZA
dc.subject Wetland ecosystem en_ZA
dc.subject Stated preference choice experiment (SPCE) en_ZA
dc.subject Restoration en_ZA
dc.subject Latent class model (LCM) en_ZA
dc.title Public preferences for ecological indicators used in Everglades restoration en_ZA
dc.type Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record