Rift Valley fever virus exposure amongst farmers, farm workers, and veterinary professionals in central South Africa

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Msimang, Veerle
dc.contributor.author Thompson, P.N. (Peter N.)
dc.contributor.author Jansen van Vuren, Petrus
dc.contributor.author Tempia, Stefano
dc.date.accessioned 2020-06-17T07:09:09Z
dc.date.available 2020-06-17T07:09:09Z
dc.date.issued 2019-02
dc.description.abstract Rift Valley fever (RVF) is a re-emerging arboviral disease of public health and veterinary importance in Africa and the Arabian Peninsula. Major RVF epidemics were documented in South Africa in 1950–1951, 1974–1975, and 2010–2011. The number of individuals infected during these outbreaks has, however, not been accurately estimated. A total of 823 people in close occupational contact with livestock were interviewed and sampled over a six-month period in 2015–2016 within a 40,000 km2 study area encompassing parts of the Free State and Northern Cape provinces that were affected during the 2010–2011 outbreak. Seroprevalence of RVF virus (RVFV) was 9.1% (95% Confidence Interval (CI95%): 7.2–11.5%) in people working or residing on livestock or game farms and 8.0% in veterinary professionals. The highest seroprevalence (SP = 15.4%; CI95%: 11.4–20.3%) was detected in older age groups ( 40 years old) that had experienced more than one known large epidemic compared to the younger participants (SP = 4.3%; CI95%: 2.6–7.3%). The highest seroprevalence was in addition found in people who injected animals, collected blood samples (Odds ratio (OR) = 2.3; CI95%: 1.0–5.3), slaughtered animals (OR = 3.9; CI95%: 1.2–12.9) and consumed meat from an animal found dead (OR = 3.1; CI95%: 1.5–6.6), or worked on farms with dams for water storage (OR = 2.7; CI95%: 1.0–6.9). We estimated the number of historical RVFV infections of farm staff in the study area to be most likely 3849 and 95% credible interval between 2635 and 5374 based on seroprevalence of 9.1% and national census data. We conclude that human RVF cases were highly underdiagnosed and heterogeneously distributed. Improving precautions during injection, sample collection, slaughtering, and meat processing for consumption, and using personal protective equipment during outbreaks, could lower the risk of RVFV infection. en_ZA
dc.description.department Animal and Wildlife Sciences en_ZA
dc.description.librarian pm2020 en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorship U.S. Department of Defense, Defense Threat Reduction Agency en_ZA
dc.description.uri https://www.mdpi.com/journal/viruses en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Msimang, V., Thompson, P.N., Jansen van Vuren, P. et al, 2019, 'Rift Valley fever virus exposure amongst farmers, farm workers, and veterinary professionals in central South Africa', Viruses, vol. 11, no, 2, art. 140, pp. 1-18. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 1999-4915 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.3390/v11020140
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/75005
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher MDPI en_ZA
dc.rights © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). en_ZA
dc.subject Emerging disease en_ZA
dc.subject South Africa (SA) en_ZA
dc.subject Seroprevalence en_ZA
dc.subject Human exposure en_ZA
dc.subject Statistical case estimation en_ZA
dc.subject Spatial distribution en_ZA
dc.subject Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV) en_ZA
dc.title Rift Valley fever virus exposure amongst farmers, farm workers, and veterinary professionals in central South Africa en_ZA
dc.type Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record