Abstract:
Optimal foraging theory provides a powerful quantitative framework to reveal how foraging constraints and
options define the interplay between forager and resource distributions. Although illegal hunting threatens
wildlife worldwide, few studies have assessed the impact of poaching on the ability of animals to optimise their
use of resources. We assessed how the risk of poaching hinders the ability of common reedbuck (Redunca arundinum),
red hartebeest (Alcelaphus buselaphus), and plains zebra (Equus quagga) to maximise their daily intake
of digestible energy in a complex mosaic of post-fire vegetation, in a small fenced nature reserve. Optimality
models predict that all species can maximise their intake of digestible energy by feeding in young post-fire
patches (29–37 days). We show that for all species, probability of finding and selectively using such high-value
vegetation patches was higher at greater distance from points where poachers were likely to enter the reserve.
For reedbuck, optimal patches were used only if they were>3.4 km from poacher entry-points. Red hartebeest
became more likely to occur in optimal vegetation patches as the distance to likely poacher entry points increased.
Only zebra maximized their daily intake of digestible energy regardless of the distance to poachers, but
still selected areas where poaching was less likely. This study demonstrates how spatial patterns in poacher
activities and post-fire vegetation interact to shape herbivore distribution. Understanding how herbivores track
and use this post fire green-up of vegetation is important for protected area managers to understand the tradeoffs
that herbivores make when foraging.
