Please note, we are experiencing high volume submissions; you will receive confirmations of submissions in due course. Data upload (DOI): https://researchdata.up.ac.za/ UPSpace: https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/51914
dc.contributor.author | Davis, Nerhene![]() |
|
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-04-23T11:18:04Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.description.abstract | Since 2005, South Africa’s post-apartheid state has opted to impose inclusive business model arrangements between land claimant communities and private sector partners to ensure the “successful” resolution of claims involving prime agricultural land. This approach was deemed compatible to achieve both restorative justice imperatives and capacitation or entrepreneurial objectives. Using the settlement of the Moletele restitution case as reference, this paper argues that these types of arrangements tend to entrench the hegemony of the state’s belief in the productivist, large-scale farming model as the most viable approach to rural restitution. These initiatives also calibrate the role of the state, private sector and restitution beneficiaries into configurations that fail to facilitate genuine levels of restorative justice or capacitation, thus fuelling the calls towards more retributive forms of land redistribution. | en_ZA |
dc.description.department | Geography, Geoinformatics and Meteorology | en_ZA |
dc.description.embargo | 2021-06-03 | |
dc.description.librarian | hj2020 | en_ZA |
dc.description.sponsorship | The University of the Western Cape SANAP Programme (2010–2014) and the University of Pretoria NRF Mentoring Initiative (2017–2018). | en_ZA |
dc.description.uri | https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rasa20 | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.citation | Nerhene C. Davis (2019) Implications of incomplete restorative justice in South African land restitution: lessons from the Moletele case, Anthropology Southern Africa, 42:3, 217-231, DOI: 10.1080/23323256.2019.1639523. | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn | 2332-3256 (print) | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2332-3264 (online) | |
dc.identifier.other | 10.1080/23323256.2019.1639523 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/74358 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_ZA |
dc.publisher | Routledge | en_ZA |
dc.rights | © 2019 Anthropology Southern Africa. This is an electronic version of an article published in Anthropology Southern Africa,42:3, 217-231, DOI: 10.1080/23323256.2019.1639523. Anthropology Southern Africa is available online at : http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rasa20. | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Limpopo | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Moletele | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Partnerships | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Restitution | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Restorative justice | en_ZA |
dc.title | Implications of incomplete restorative justice in South African land restitution : lessons from the Moletele case | en_ZA |
dc.type | Postprint Article | en_ZA |