A comparative assessment of adult mosquito trapping methods to estimate spatial patterns of abundance and community composition in southern Africa

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Gorsich, Erin E.
dc.contributor.author Beechler, Brianna R.
dc.contributor.author Van Bodegom, Peter M.
dc.contributor.author Govender, Danny
dc.contributor.author Guarido, Milehna M.
dc.contributor.author Venter, Marietjie
dc.contributor.author Schrama, Maarten
dc.date.accessioned 2019-12-13T08:19:43Z
dc.date.available 2019-12-13T08:19:43Z
dc.date.issued 2019-10-02
dc.description Additional file 1: Table S1. The number of females collected by trap and site. The mosquito column (mosq) indicates the number of females collected; the traps column of trapping nights represented. Table S2. The number of females collected of each species by region of the park. Table S3. Summary of weather conditions sampled within each region of the park. Numbers are displayed as median and range in parentheses.
dc.description Additional file 2: Text S1. Additional methods and results for the regression analysis. Table S4. Model parameters, estimates, standard error (SE) and hypothesis tests for the Poisson regression analyses in Fig. 3.
dc.description Additional file 3: Table S5. Data on the number of species collected.
dc.description Additional file 4: Table S6. Descriptive results comparing species-specific shifts in mosquito communities collected in the net and CDC trap. Species more commonly collected in a trap are listed if 5 more were collected in that trap after all sampling days at the site. Figure S1. The apparent richness (number of unique species) and diversity for sites within each region. Figure S2. Non-metric multidimensional scaling ordinations of trap differences in mosquito communities in Malelane, Satara, Shingwedzi and Punda Maria. Figure S3. Species-specific trap preferences for the net vs CDC trap difference based on rare species not displayed in Fig. 3. Dots represent the difference in the number of mosquitoes collected in the net vs the CDC trap based on the total number of mosquitoes sampled across nights at each site. Figure S4. The net trap and the CDC trap caught higher numbers of mosquitoes (Fig. 3) and this pattern was not driven by any species or genus-specific trap bias (left figures) but by variation in the total number of the species collected (right figures). Figure S5. Dendrogram of species composition based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity and the hierarchical clustering algorithm.
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND : Assessing adult mosquito populations is an important component of disease surveillance programs and ecosystem health assessments. Inference from adult trapping datasets involves comparing populations across space and time, but comparisons based on different trapping methods may be biased if traps have different efficiencies or sample different subsets of the mosquito community. METHODS : We compared four widely-used trapping methods for adult mosquito data collection in Kruger National Park (KNP), South Africa: Centers for Disease Control miniature light trap (CDC), Biogents Sentinel trap (BG), Biogents gravid Aedes trap (GAT) and a net trap. We quantified how trap choice and sampling effort influence inferences on the regional distribution of mosquito abundance, richness and community composition. RESULTS : The CDC and net traps together collected 96% (47% and 49% individually) of the 955 female mosquitoes sampled and 100% (85% and 78% individually) of the 40 species or species complexes identified. The CDC and net trap also identified similar regional patterns of community composition. However, inference on the regional patterns of abundance differed between these traps because mosquito abundance in the net trap was influenced by variation in weather conditions. The BG and GAT traps collected significantly fewer mosquitoes, limiting regional comparisons of abundance and community composition. CONCLUSIONS : This study represents the first systematic assessment of trapping methods in natural savanna ecosystems in southern Africa. We recommend the CDC trap or the net trap for future monitoring and surveillance programs. en_ZA
dc.description.department Medical Virology en_ZA
dc.description.librarian am2019 en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorship The Gratama Fund from the University of Leiden (Grant Number 2016.08) to MS, the Uyttenboogaart-Eliasen foundation for comparative entomology to EEG (SUB.2016.12.08) and the RCN-IDEAS travel grant to EEG. en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://www.parasitesandvectors.com en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Gorsich, E.E., Beechler, B.R., Van Bodegom, P.M. et al. 2019, 'A comparative assessment of adult mosquito trapping methods to estimate spatial patterns of abundance and community composition in southern Africa', Parasites Vectors, vol. 12, art. 462, pp. 1-12. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 1756-3305 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1186/s13071-019-3733-z
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/72809
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher BioMed Central en_ZA
dc.rights © The Author(s) 2019. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. en_ZA
dc.subject Arboviruses en_ZA
dc.subject Community composition en_ZA
dc.subject Mosquito en_ZA
dc.subject Trap bias en_ZA
dc.subject Vectors en_ZA
dc.subject Kruger National Park (KNP) en_ZA
dc.subject Kruger National Park (South Africa) en_ZA
dc.subject Net trap en_ZA
dc.subject Gravid Aedes trap (GAT) en_ZA
dc.title A comparative assessment of adult mosquito trapping methods to estimate spatial patterns of abundance and community composition in southern Africa en_ZA
dc.type Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record