Spotting the liar in the witness box – how valuable is demeanour evidence really? (2)

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Gravett, W.H. (Willem)

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

LexisNexis

Abstract

In the previous part of this contribution I discussed the history of so-called “demeanour evidence” and its current role in the law of evidence. I furthermore examined the extensive empirical evidence that shows that demeanour – as a means of accurate and reliable credibility assessment and decision-making in litigation – essentially is worthless. Human lie detection is fraught with difficulty. It is predicated upon a multitude of misconceptions about how liars behave, including specific verbal and nonverbal cues commonly believed to indicate dishonesty. Below I continue with an analysis of the social science research data on veracity judgments based on demeanour in order to attempt to answer the question: Why are human beings such poor lie detectors? Next I expound upon the reasons why lie detection in court might actually be more difficult than in a laboratory setting. I then explore the potential impact of empirical findings upon the principle of appellate deference to credibility findings of first instance. I conclude by addressing the question regarding the appropriate response of the legal system in the face of the overwhelming research data on the lack of reliability of so-called “demeanour evidence”.

Description

Keywords

Human lie detection, Veracity judgments, Lie detection in court, Demeanour evidence

Sustainable Development Goals

Citation

Gravett, W.H. 2018, 'Spotting the liar in the witness box – how valuable is demeanour evidence really? (2)', Journal of Contemporary Roman Dutch Law / Tydskrif Vir Hedendaagse Romeins-Hollandse Reg, vol. 81, pp. 563-575.