Abstract:
The fire behaviour of linear low-density polyethylene composites containing 10 wt.% of different carbon-based fillers was studied. Cone calorimeter tests conducted at a heat flux of 35 kW_m_2 showed that the expandable graphite sample reduced the peak heat release rate by about 50 % while the flake graphite increased the ignition time by about 80 %. Pyrolysis combustion flow calorimetry results were practically identical for all composites. This reveals shortcomings of this bench-scale flammability test method when the flame retardancy mechanisms relies on either the development of physical barrier layer at the surface of the burning sample or on reflecting the incident heat flux. Similarly, it was found that laser pyrolysis-thermogravimetric analysis generated outcomes that did not correlate with the cone calorimeter results at all. In particular, the composite based on expandable graphite performed poorly. The likely explanation is that the aspect ratios of the small samples were such that the barrier effects on which this system relies, was negated by edge effects.
