Comparison of a non-spoken response mode and a spoken response mode in a test of phonological awareness
Loading...
Date
Authors
Casey, Maureen Anne
Tonsing, Kerstin Monika
Alant, Erna
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
OTASA: Occupational Therapy Association of South Africa
Abstract
Assessing students with moderate to severe disabilities, and especially those with little or no functional speech (LNFS), often necessitates accommodation of assessment material. These accommodations need to be equivalent to the original testing procedure. The aim of this study was to compare two different modes of response, one spoken and one using eye-gaze, to determine the influence of response mode on test results. A cross-over within-subject counterbalance design using multiple subjects was used1. Forty-eight typically developing Grade 1 children participated
in the study. Participants were individually required to respond to 90 phonological awareness questions using either a spoken “Yes/No” response or a non-spoken “Yes/No” response by using eye-gaze. The response modes were controlled for order effect and analysed using ANOVA. No
statistically significant difference was found between the two response modes.
Description
Keywords
Assessment, Eye-gaze transfer board (ETRAN), Little or no functional speech (LNFS), Phonological awareness, Test accommodations
Sustainable Development Goals
Citation
Casey, M, Tönsing, KM & Alant, E 2007, 'Comparison of a non-spoken response mode and a spoken response mode in a test of phonological awareness', South African Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 25-28. [http://www.otasa.org.za/otasa_journal/index.html]