Exploring cashless fare collection in the context of urban public transport reform in South Africa

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Schalekamp, H. en
dc.contributor.author Mclaren, M. en
dc.contributor.author Behrens, R. en
dc.date.accessioned 2017-10-13T13:39:01Z
dc.date.available 2017-10-13T13:39:01Z
dc.date.issued 2017 en
dc.description Papers presented at the 36th Southern African Transport Conference, CSIR International Convention Centre, Pretoria, South Africa on 10-13 July 2017. en
dc.description.abstract As in many developing countries, in South Africa unscheduled paratransit services dominate urban public transport. Despite the resulting scale of fare revenue, the majority of the country’s minibus-taxis operate as cash-only businesses. Drivers typically keep the balance of fare revenue after vehicle rental and fuel consumption payments, while owners seldom include vehicle depreciation as a daily operating expense. There are a number of common consequences. Drivers behave recklessly as they seek to achieve as many peak period trips as possible to maximise income. Capital reserves or affordable finance are not available to renew vehicle fleets. Business owners find it difficult to make operating decisions based on an income-expenditure ledger and principles of profit and loss. Paratransit services are poorly integrated into multi-modal systems when passengers pay fares through different structures and media. Moreover, in contexts where crime and corruption are widespread, on-board cash holding makes public transport vehicles particularly vulnerable. The aim of this paper is to explore the potential of various cashless fare collection (CFC) systems to mitigate these problems, and to review the technology alternatives that are available. The paper presents the results of a review of alternative approaches to CFC, and a qualitative multi-criteria evaluation of these technological alternatives. The criteria include: user and operator acceptability; payment and physical infrastructure; information technology requirements; financial and human resources; and transaction and technology complexity. The three CFC systems that achieved the highest scores in the multi-criteria evaluation were all mobile phone-/mobile network-based systems. Of the three lowest scoring CFC systems, two relied on the passenger having a bank account and one on creating a free-standing fare management and payment system. A key recommendation is that CFC systems are implemented collaboratively and incrementally in order to achieve the requisite stakeholder support. en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorship Transportation research board of the national academies en
dc.format.extent 16 pages en
dc.format.mimetype PDF en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/62743
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher Southern African Transport Conference en
dc.rights University of Pretoria en
dc.subject South Africa en
dc.subject Cashless fare collection en
dc.subject Urban public transport en
dc.title Exploring cashless fare collection in the context of urban public transport reform in South Africa en
dc.type Presentation en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record