Monitoring and evaluation practice standards in South African Social Work and Criminology

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Terblanche, Lourie en
dc.contributor.coadvisor Steyn, Francois en
dc.contributor.postgraduate Caleni, Hlobokazi en
dc.date.accessioned 2017-10-11T11:55:57Z
dc.date.available 2017-10-11T11:55:57Z
dc.date.created 2017-09-06 en
dc.date.issued 2017 en
dc.description Mini Dissertation (MSW)--University of Pretoria, 2017. en
dc.description.abstract Employee Assistance Programmes are considered to have grown immensely since an EAP was first introduced in 1986 and formally structured (EAPA-SA, 2010). The first EAPA-SA standards document was developed in 1999 and revised in 2005 and 2010 to ensure it reflects local and international best practices. The goal of the study was to explore the EAP practices of EAPA-SA members benchmarked against EAPA-SA standards. A survey was conducted by a group of students with EAP professionals, specifically registered as EAPA-SA members in 2014, under the supervision of Prof. L. S. Terblanche. The researcher identified the need to benchmark existing EAP practices against the EAPA-SA Standards document to assess whether these practices fulfil their purpose. The research focused on assessing the Monitoring and Evaluation standards of EAPs as applied in SA practices, benchmarked against EAPA-SA standards. The findings reveal less than half of respondents confirmed the existence of a monitoring and evaluation strategy in their practices. Less than half confirmed that monitoring is performed by their EAPs. Evaluation responses were alarming, as few confirmed evaluation of their EAPs. EAP core technologies are also covered by but a few respondents. Internal EAP practitioners were identified as the main persons responsible for monitoring and evaluation. Low percentages of respondents confirmed carrying out EAP evaluations. Avoidance of monitoring and evaluation may be due to anxieties and embarrassment that could arise from any negative findings of the EAP. It is crucial to engage outside, trained evaluators for programme monitoring and evaluation for the purpose of objective programme evaluation. en_ZA
dc.description.availability Unrestricted en
dc.description.degree MSW en
dc.description.department Social Work and Criminology en
dc.identifier.citation Caleni, HH 2017, Monitoring and evaluation practice standards in South African Social Work and Criminology, MSW Mini Dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/62671> en
dc.identifier.other S2017 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/62671
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher University of Pretoria en
dc.rights © 2017 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. en
dc.subject UCTD en
dc.title Monitoring and evaluation practice standards in South African Social Work and Criminology en_ZA
dc.type Mini Dissertation en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record