A measuring instrument for ethical sensitivity in the therapeutic sciences

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Naude, Alida
dc.contributor.author Bornman, Juan, 1968-
dc.date.accessioned 2017-08-23T05:14:11Z
dc.date.available 2017-08-23T05:14:11Z
dc.date.issued 2016-05-13
dc.description.abstract An emerging literature in behavioural ethics conceptualized ethical sensitivity as a critical part of the decision making process. Ethical sensitivity together with an understanding of the client, their needs, emotions and circumstances is fundamental to an effective therapeutic relationship and competent practice. This study appears to be the first to empirically measure this concept in decision making related to the therapeutic sciences, including audiology, occupational therapy, physiotherapy and speech-language therapy. A multidisciplinary measure of ethical sensitivity is developed and consists of 12 vignettes that represent clinically relevant ethical issues related to these four professions. The study followed a two-phase, sequential mixed-methods research approach. Phase 1, the qualitative stage, focused on developing a measuring instrument by means of a systematic review of the following: ethical codes of conduct; focus group discussions; individual in-depth interviews; an expert panel review; and public complaints websites. Phase 2, the quantitative stage, focused on implementing and evaluating the measuring instrument. One hundred participants representing the four professions completed the instrument. Participants’ overall scores on the Measuring Instrument for Ethical Sensitivity in the Therapeutic sciences (MIEST) were comparable for all four professions, confirming the multidisciplinary usability of the instrument. Participants were inclined to make grounded Beneficence centred decisions. Participants were particularly sensitive about the impact of the therapist’s actions on the individual client, and sometimes overlooked their duty to the community. The MIEST can be used to assess the ethical sensitivity of student therapists (and possibly qualified therapists) and describe the stage of their ethical sensitivity development throughout the course of their professional development. The constructed vignettes make the MIEST appropriate for use in problem-based learning programmes. en_ZA
dc.description.department Centre for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (CAAC) en_ZA
dc.description.librarian am2017 en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorship The National Research Foundation (NRF) en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/hss en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Alida Naudé, Juan Bornman. A Measuring Instrument for Ethical Sensitivity in the Therapeutic Sciences. Humanities and Social Sciences. Special Issue: Ethical Sensitivity: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Vol. 4, No. 2-1, 2016, pp. 29-36. DOI: 10.11648/j.hss.s.2016040201.15. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 2330-8176 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 2330-8184 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.11648/j.hss.s.2016040201.15
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/61758
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher Science Publishing Group en_ZA
dc.rights © 2017 Authors retain the copyright of this article. This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License. en_ZA
dc.subject Ethical principle en_ZA
dc.subject Ethical sensitivity en_ZA
dc.subject Therapist en_ZA
dc.subject Perspective taking en_ZA
dc.subject Beneficence en_ZA
dc.title A measuring instrument for ethical sensitivity in the therapeutic sciences en_ZA
dc.type Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record