The influence of the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 and the plain language requirement of pharmaceutical product labelling

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Barnard, Jacolien en
dc.contributor.postgraduate Rudman, Jolandi en
dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-26T11:51:52Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-26T11:51:52Z
dc.date.created 2017/04/06 en
dc.date.issued 2016 en
dc.description Mini Dissertation (LLM)--University of Pretoria, 2016. en
dc.description.abstract The dissertation deals with the influence of the plain language requirement provided for in section 22 of the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 (CPA) on the current practice of pharmaceutical product labelling. The introduction in Chapter 1 sets the scene by providing an overview of the dissertation: It includes a brief description and layout of the chapters; a discussion of the research problem and aims; a demarcation of the methodology used; and an explanation of the scope, limitations and delineations of the study. The focus in chapter 2 is on prescription medication and the legislation applicable thereto. The focus is on the Medicines and Related Substances Act 101 of 1965, specifically regulations 8 to 10 promulgated in terms thereof. Furthermore, the relevant provisions of both the abovementioned Acts are critically discussed and analysed. An overview of the appropriate supply chain in this specific context is provided with reference to medical practitioners, pharmacists and suppliers. Section 61 of the CPA concerning damaged goods is also examined. The development, meaning and importance of plain language as well as the application and definition of an ?educated consumer? are discussed in chapter 3. As this study concerns product labelling, section 24 of the CPA as well as the terms ?product labelling? and ?package inserts? are examined in chapter 4. At the same time, section 22 and the meaning of ?document?, ?notice? and ?visual representation? are kept in mind. The dissertation is concluded in chapter 5. Here the final part of the golden thread is completed ? the aims described in chapter 1 are confirmed through a brief summation of the information provided and investigated in chapters 2 to 4. en_ZA
dc.description.availability Unrestricted en
dc.description.degree LLM en
dc.description.department Mercantile Law en
dc.identifier.citation Rudman, J 2016, The influence of the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 and the plain language requirement of pharmaceutical product labelling, LLM Mini Dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/60089> en
dc.identifier.other A2017 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/60089
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher University of Pretoria en
dc.rights © 2017 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. en
dc.subject UCTD en
dc.title The influence of the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 and the plain language requirement of pharmaceutical product labelling en_ZA
dc.type Mini Dissertation en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record