Revisiting the "to be or not to be" debate and comments on Netshituka v Netshituka 2011 5 SA 453 (SCA)
Loading...
Date
Authors
Maithufi, Ignatius Philip
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
LexisNexis
Abstract
Determining the validity of a customary marriage or a civil marriage which was
contracted during the subsistence of another marriage (a civil or customary
marriage) has plagued South African courts for a number of years (see Maithufi
“To be or not to be: Does this question still arise?“ 2013 TSAR 723). The general
principle since Nkabula v Linda 1951 1 SA 377 (A) was that no customary
marriage could exist in the face of a civil marriage. The effect was that a civil
marriage dissolved a subsisting customary marriage between a husband and a
woman other than his wife, by customary rites. It also meant that a customary
marriage which was entered into during the subsistence of a civil marriage was
null and void ab initio (Bennet Customary law in Southern Africa (2004) 239–
240).
Description
Keywords
Validity, Customary marriage, Civil marriage, Courts
Sustainable Development Goals
Citation
Maithufi, IP 2015, 'Revisiting the "to be or not to be" debate and comments on Netshituka v Netshituka 2011 5 SA 453 (SCA)', Journal of Contemporary Roman Dutch Law / Tydskrif Vir Hedendaagse Romeins-Hollandse Reg, vol. 78, pp. 307-317.