Cover crops of oats, stooling rye and three annual ryegrass cultivars influence maize and Cyperus esculentus growth

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Bezuidenhout, S.R.
Reinhardt, Carl Frederick (Charlie)
Whitwell, M.I.

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Wiley

Abstract

No information is available on the effect of cover crops on weed growth in maize production in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. In a field experiment, the influence of two preceding cover crops, stooling rye and annual ryegrass, on the growth of maize and the weed Cyperus esculentus were compared with herbicides and weed control by hoeing. Maize emergence and early growth were delayed in the presence of physical residues of both cover crop species, especially in annual ryegrass residues. Growth of C. esculentus was significantly inhibited in the inter-row maize planting lines by the cover crops for the first 16 days after maize emergence, but this effect had diminished by day 28. In a pot experiment, the influence of the same two cover crops on maize and C. esculentus growth was evaluated together with oats and two additional annual ryegrass cultivars. Here the growth of maize and C. esculentus growth was suppressed, especially by the root residues of the annual ryegrass, in particular the cultivar Midmar. Chemical analysis of the leachate of the root residues indicated the presence of phenolic acids and benzoxazolin-2(3H)-one (BOA). In order to achieve effective weed control, a weed management strategy combining the mulch retained on the soil surface with a possible reduction in the type and amount of herbicide(s) should be implemented.

Description

Keywords

Allelopathy, Allelochemicals, Crop management, Weed suppression, Oats, Stooling rye, Ryegrass cultivars, Maize growth, Cyperus esculentus growth

Sustainable Development Goals

Citation

Bezuidenhout, SR, Reinhardt, CF & Whitwell, MI 2012, 'Cover crops of oats, stooling rye and three annual ryegrass cultivars influence maize and Cyperus esculentus growth', Weed Research, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 153-160.