Abstract:
This brief commentary takes its inspiration from the opening address delivered by
John Hoffman, and printed in these pages; that is, progress is usefully understood
as a contradictory, contested and ambiguous process. But rather than attempt a
comprehensive survey of the past 40 or so years of academic analyses of
Zimbabwe’s pasts, what follows has as its focus the emergence of ‘patriotic
history’ and particularly its nationalist antecedents. These are critically examined.
Although not concerned with the generality of recent studies that are neither
nationalist nor materialist in orientation, this paper sketches in outline the rise,
fall and rise of radical accounts. It ends by suggesting how such analyses might be
taken forward.
