The marathon of the hare and the tortoise : implementing the EU Water Framework Directive
Loading...
Date
Authors
Bourblanc, Magalie
Crabbe, Ann
Liefferink, Duncan
Wiering, Mark
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Taylor and Francis
Abstract
Reading the available evidence on the implementation of the European Water Framework
Directive (WFD), one gets the impression that some countries anticipate implementation
problems by starting off pragmatically and with relatively low ambitions, while others make a
quick and ambitious start and tend to slow down in later phases of the process. Inspired by
Lundqvist’s classical study of air pollution policy in the USA and Sweden, we assess the
importance of some general characteristics of the respective political-institutional systems to
explain differences in WFD implementation in four EU countries: Denmark, France, England/
Wales and the Netherlands. We conclude, among other things, that visibility of the policy
process, accountability of politicians and policy makers vis-a`-vis their stakeholders and the
EU, division of responsibilities for policy formulation vs. implementation and the involvement
of the public explain the level of ambition in EU implementation to a considerable extent.
Thus, the Lundqvist variables turn out to be useful for both classifying and explaining
differences in EU implementation processes.
Description
Keywords
Policy implementation, EU environmental policy, Discretion, Water Framework Directive (WFD), European Union (EU)
Sustainable Development Goals
Citation
Magalie Bourblanc , Ann Crabbé , Duncan Liefferink & Mark Wiering (2013) The marathon of the hare and the tortoise: implementing the EU Water Framework Directive, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56:10, 1449-1467, DOI:10.1080/09640568.2012.726197.