dc.contributor.author |
Stander, Karen
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Pretorius, Marius
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2016-10-21T05:44:10Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2016-10-21T05:44:10Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2016-07-29 |
|
dc.description |
K.S. executed the study independently in partial fulfillment
of her PhD under the supervision and oversight of M.P. |
en_ZA |
dc.description.abstract |
ORIENTATION : In 2009, Strategy-as-Practice (S-as-P) research, as a subfield of strategy research,
was grouped into nine different domains, and researchers were advised to frame their research
within these domains. The papers or works (herein used interchangeably) published with
S-as-P as subject, were counted, categorised, and a typology matrix was constructed.
Researchers use this count to indicate a need for research in a specific domain.
RESEARCH PURPOSE : The main purpose of this study is to construct a comparative S-as-P
typology matrix which accurately depicts the number of papers published in each domain
between 2008 and 2015.
MOTIVATION FOR THE STUDY : The S-as-P typology matrix was first published in 2009 (Jarzabkowski &
Spee 2009), and at the present moment, six years later, researchers still use the dated number
of papers counted in each of the S-as-P domains to indicate a research gap.
RESEARCH DESIGN, APPROACH AND METHOD : A content analysis of all papers, listed by researchers
on the official S-as-P website, was conducted. The papers were disseminated and key variables
were counted.
MAIN FINDINGSain findings: The comparative typology matrix shows that relative to other domains,
domain D appears overly researched, whilst no research has been carried out on domains C
and H from 2008 to 2015.
PRACTICAL/MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS : The comparative S-as-P typology matrix allows researchers
to accurately evaluate the need for current research within the chosen domain.
CONTRIBUTION/VALUE-ADD : The comparative typology matrix should prevent, as is the case
currently with domain D, that domains are over-researched, whilst others receive no research
attention. |
en_ZA |
dc.description.department |
Business Management |
en_ZA |
dc.description.librarian |
am2016 |
en_ZA |
dc.description.uri |
http://www.actacommercii.co.za/ |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.citation |
Stander, K. & Pretorius, M.,
2016, ‘The next step in the
strategy–as–practice
evolution: A comparative
typology matrix’, Acta
Commercii 16(1), a328.
http://dx.DOI.org/ 10.4102/ac.v16i1.328. |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn |
2413-1903 (print) |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1684-1999 (online) |
|
dc.identifier.other |
10.4102/ac.v16i1.328 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/57398 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_ZA |
dc.publisher |
University of Johannesburg |
en_ZA |
dc.rights |
© 2016. The Authors.
Licensee: AOSIS. This work
is licensed under the
Creative Commons
Attribution License. |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Typology matrix |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Researchers |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Strategy-as-Practice (S-as-P) |
en_ZA |
dc.title |
The next step in the strategy–as–practice evolution : a comparative typology matrix |
en_ZA |
dc.type |
Article |
en_ZA |