Net loss of endangered humpback dolphins : integrating residency, site fidelity, and bycatch in shark nets

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Atkins, Shanan
dc.contributor.author Cantor, Maurício
dc.contributor.author Pillay, Neville
dc.contributor.author Cliff, Geremy
dc.contributor.author Keith, Mark
dc.contributor.author Parra, Guido J.
dc.date.accessioned 2016-10-13T08:55:48Z
dc.date.issued 2016-08
dc.description.abstract Fisheries bycatch—the incidental catch of non-target species during fishing—is problematic for large marine vertebrates. Bather protection programmes that use gillnets to kill sharks cause the incidental mortality of humpback dolphins Sousa spp., potentially impacting the long-term survival of these threatened species. Understanding dolphins’ spatial and temporal use of gillnetted areas is critical for designing effective mitigation strategies. We photo-identified dolphins over 8 yr in a high-bycatch area (Richards Bay, South Africa) to assess the residency, site fidelity, and movement patterns of Indian Ocean humpback dolphins S. plumbea and evaluate how emigration, immigration, and mortality rates influence the use of Richards Bay at various temporal scales. Overall, residency was low but site fidelity was high, leading to high population turnover in the short term but low turnover over 6 mo and longer. There was clear individual variation in visitation but no evidence of seasonality. By considering such movements, the net loss of dolphins from the area became evident. While dolphins naturally emigrate from the area, the recognition of several catalogued individuals among the bycaught dolphins indicated that mortality in the shark nets contributes to the permanent loss of both residents and transients. Richards Bay may represent an ecological trap: high site fidelity indicates dolphins perceived the area as ecologically attractive, but high mortality due to shark nets makes it risky. We examined these results relative to gillnet bycatch mitigation methods and recommend that stakeholders collaborate as a mitigation team to prioritise management actions to reduce bycatch without compromising bather safety. en_ZA
dc.description.department Centre for Wildlife Management en_ZA
dc.description.embargo 2017-08-31
dc.description.librarian hb2016 en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorship This project was funded by supporters of the Endangered Wildlife Trust, due to Pat Fletcher’s efforts. M.C. was supported by CNPq (Brazil) and Killam Trusts (Canada). en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://www.int-res.com/journals/meps/meps-home en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Atkins, S, Cantor, M, Pillay, N, Cliff, G, Keith, M & Parra, GJ 2016, 'Net loss of endangered humpback dolphins : integrating residency, site fidelity, and bycatch in shark nets', Marine Ecology Progress Series, vol. 555, pp. 249-260 en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 0171-8630 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 1616-1599 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.3354/meps11835
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/57148
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher Inter Research en_ZA
dc.rights Inter Research en_ZA
dc.subject Bycatch mitigation en_ZA
dc.subject Incidental catch en_ZA
dc.subject Gillnets en_ZA
dc.subject Residency en_ZA
dc.subject Site fidelity en_ZA
dc.subject Cetaceans en_ZA
dc.subject Bather protection en_ZA
dc.subject South Africa (SA) en_ZA
dc.title Net loss of endangered humpback dolphins : integrating residency, site fidelity, and bycatch in shark nets en_ZA
dc.type Postprint Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record