Comparing two response modes in a mathematics test for learners in foundation phase with severe physical disabilities : a South African example
Loading...
Date
Authors
Bornman, Juan
Donohue, Dana K.
Mare, Nolette
Dada, Shakila
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Kamla-Raj Enterprises
Abstract
Research suggests that tests with non-modified response formats may be biased against learners with
severe physical disabilities, with test scores reflecting the extent of learners’ disabilities rather than their actual
potential. This study aimed to compare the performance of learners with severe physical impairments on their
mathematics scores using two different response modes. Forty-two learners from schools in the Gauteng province
in South Africa were selected for the study. A cross-over within-groups design was used. Participants were randomly
assigned to two groups; each learner participated in both conditions (oral response and eye gaze), but in the
opposite order. The tests were repeated after a week when the alternative response mode was used. Participants’
scores for the eye-gaze response mode were found to be significantly higher than their scores for the oral response
mode. Implications for use in the classroom are discussed.
Description
Keywords
Accommodation, Alternative response modes, E-tran, Eye-gaze, Oral response mode
Sustainable Development Goals
Citation
Bornman, J, Donohue, DK, Mare, N & Dada, S 2016, 'Comparing two response modes in a mathematics test for learners in foundation phase with severe physical disabilities : a South African example', International Journal of Educational Sciences, vol. 14, no. 1-2, pp. 37-44.