Two decades of qualitative research in psychology, industrial and organisational psychology and human resource management within South Africa : a critical review

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author O'Neil, Susanna Maria
dc.contributor.author Koekemoer, Eileen
dc.date.accessioned 2016-08-23T12:55:44Z
dc.date.available 2016-08-23T12:55:44Z
dc.date.issued 2016-07-29
dc.description.abstract ORIENTATION : Qualitative research is marked by phenomenal growth and development over the years. RESEARCH PURPOSE : This article aims to offer insight into the emerging qualitative methodologies used in the fields of Psychology, Industrial and Organisational Psychology and Human Resource Management. MOTIVATION FOR THE STUDY : The value of qualitative organisational research has been recognised since the 1970s. Regardless of its perceived value, national and international trends show a greater tendency for quantitative research. RESEARCH DESIGN, APPROACH AND METHOD : This article investigates qualitative articles (n = 242) published over two decades in the South African Journal of Industrial Psychology (SAJIP), South African Journal of Psychology (SAJP), and the South African Journal of Human Resource Management (SAJHRM). More specifically, a content analysis was conducted to highlight the trends of paradigms, designs and analysis methods employed in the studies. MAIN FINDINGS : Although there seems to be a slight increase in qualitative publications over the years, qualitative studies show a lower volume than its counterparts. The SAJIP published the least qualitative articles when compared to the SAJP and SAJHRM. There is a pattern of preference for specific paradigms and methods in all the journals. Overall, all the journals carry a large number of articles that do not specifically state their paradigmatic alignment or the designs they used, while some articles omits the methodology used in the studies altogether. PRACTICAL/MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS : The results indicate a clear need for increased exposure to qualitative methodology, both by publishing more qualitative studies in local journals and by providing formal training opportunities. A publication does not solely rely on authorship, but also on a review process. Therefore certain adjustments in this process may lead to more and better qualitative publications in future. CONTRIBUTIO/VALUE-ADD : This article provides a critical analysis of the current trends and developments in qualitative research conducted in Industrial and Organisational Psychology (IOP) research in South Africa. The study identifies dominant methodologies in use, and thereby identifies possible opportunities to expand the ‘methodological menu’ of IOP research. en_ZA
dc.description.department Human Resource Management en_ZA
dc.description.librarian am2016 en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://www.sajip.co.za/ en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation O’Neil, S., & Koekemoer, E. (2016). Two decades of qualitative research in Psychology, Industrial and Organisational Psychology and Human Resource Management within South Africa: A critical review. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology/SA Tydskrif vir Bedryfsielkunde, 42(1), a1350. http://dx.DOI. org/ 10.4102/sajip.v42i1.1350. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 0258-5200 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 2071-0763 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.4102/sajip.v42i1.1350
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/56451
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher AOSIS OpenJournals en_ZA
dc.rights © 2016. The Authors. Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License. en_ZA
dc.subject Qualitative methodologies en_ZA
dc.subject Quantitative research en_ZA
dc.subject Qualitative articles en_ZA
dc.subject Industrial and Organisational Psychology (IOP) en_ZA
dc.title Two decades of qualitative research in psychology, industrial and organisational psychology and human resource management within South Africa : a critical review en_ZA
dc.type Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record