dc.contributor.advisor |
Focke, Walter Wilhelm |
en |
dc.contributor.postgraduate |
Sibanda, Mthokozisi Mayibongwe |
en |
dc.date.accessioned |
2016-07-29T11:02:08Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2016-07-29T11:02:08Z |
|
dc.date.created |
2016-04-07 |
en |
dc.date.issued |
2015 |
en |
dc.description |
Thesis (PhD)--University of Pretoria, 2015. |
en |
dc.description.abstract |
Malaria is a parasitic disease confined mostly to tropical areas and transmitted by female
anopheles mosquitoes. It results in approximately 250 million clinical cases and nearly a
million deaths annually. Malaria is particularly prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa where it
affects mostly pregnant women and children less than five years of age. The World Health
Organisation (WHO) mainly recommends the use of long lasting insecticide treated nets
(LLIN) and indoor residual spray (IRS) to control mosquitoes. These interventions have been
very effective for the most part however they leave gaps that threaten the goal of eliminating
malaria: LLIN are only effective when a person is sleeping under the net whilst a mosquito
can still bite and infect people outdoors. LLIN also relies on pyrethroid insecticides and
mosquitoes are steadily becoming resistant to this class of insecticide. IRS is only effective
when using DDT, a persistent organic pollutant whose use in public health is very
contentious. Unfortunately insecticide alternatives to DDT, e.g. pyrethroids, carbamates and
organophosphates fail prematurely due to alkaline hydrolysis in the environment. Using these
alternatives will require repeated applications throughout the malaria transmission season
making IRS unaffordable to relatively poor African countries. Lastly, both IRS and LLIN
target the malaria vector indoors whilst infection can actually happen outdoors.
The work presented here sought to develop two cost effective and innovative ideas that may
bridge the gap left by implementing current recommended vector control interventions. These
ideas relied on the use of polymer matrices to stabilise and slowly release active agents used
in malaria vector control thereby increasing their residual effectiveness. The first idea pursued the development of an insecticide treated wall lining (ITWL). It was
envisaged that the lining may substitute the use of IRS and also complement the use of LLIN.
This lining was produced using simple extrusion of 10wt.% and 18wt.% (alpahacypemethrin
and delatamethrin loading respectively) polyethylene masterbatches with a 1:1 polymer blend
of high density polyethylene (HDPE) and low density polyethylene (LDPE) to produce a
Netlon® mesh. This mesh contained alphacypermethrin and deltamethrin in concentrations
ranging from 0.29wt.% to 0.85wt.%. The mesh linings were evaluated for acceptability,
durability and perceived effectiveness in field trials carried out in the Vhembe district of
Limpopo province, north of South Africa. In these trials it was established that majority of
the field trial participants perceived the Netlon® lining to be effective and user friendly. The
linings were stable to environmental elements that persisted inside the dwellings where they
were installed however there was some rodent damage observed. Standard bioassay tube tests
indicated that these nets remained effective for at least 24 months in the field and 36 months
after manufacture.
The second idea sought to address the need for protection against mosquito bites outdoors. It
entailed the use of polymer matrices to trap large amounts of a repellent and to release it
slowly over an extended period of time. This could increase the residual effectiveness of
volatile repellents. Possible future product concepts based on this idea include long-life
mosquito repellent bracelets and low cost slip slops.
The repellent N,N-Diethyl-meta-toluamide (DEET) was incorporated into the polymer via the
technique of spinodal decomposition. It was found possible to trap up to 50wt.% in
poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) (EVA). Thermogravimetric analysis and oven mass loss
studies showed that the filled EVA polymer matrix reduced the rate of release of the
repellent. Laboratory repellency tests suggested that these bracelets may be effective in
repelling mosquito bites for at least one month. This suggests that, in theory at least, low cost
bracelets and slip slops can be designed that would last that long. Future products based on
this idea could help reduce infections due to ankle biting by An. gambiae mosquitoes which
are responsible for a significant number of malaria infections in Africa. |
en |
dc.description.availability |
Unrestricted |
en |
dc.description.degree |
PhD |
en |
dc.description.department |
Chemical Engineering |
en |
dc.description.librarian |
tm2016 |
en |
dc.identifier.citation |
Sibanda, MM 2015, Polyolefin copolymers as controlled release devices for insecticides and repellents, PhD Thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/56108> |
en |
dc.identifier.other |
A2016 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/56108 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.publisher |
University of Pretoria |
en_ZA |
dc.rights |
© 2016 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. |
|
dc.subject |
UCTD |
en |
dc.subject.other |
Engineering, built environment and information technology theses SDG-13 |
|
dc.subject.other |
SDG-13: Climate action |
|
dc.title |
Polyolefin copolymers as controlled release devices for insecticides and repellents |
en |
dc.type |
Thesis |
en |