Pilot study to detect airborne Mycobacterium tuberculosis exposure in a South African public healthcare facility outpatient clinic

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Matuka, Onnicah
Singh, Tanusha, S.
Bryce, Elizabeth
Yassi, Annalee
Kgasha, Olga
Zungu, Laszchevon Muzimkhulu
Kyaw, Khin
Malotle, Molebogeng
Renton, Kevin
O’Hara, Lyndsay

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier

Abstract

BACKGROUND : Airborne transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) remains an occupational health hazard particularly in crowded and resource limited healthcare settings. AIM : The study aimed to quantify airborne TB in a busy outpatient clinic in Gauteng, South Africa. METHODS : Personal (HCWs) and stationary air samples were collected in the Polyclinic and Administrative block. Quantitative real-time PCR was used to detect airborne TB. Walkthrough observations and work practices of HCWs were also recorded. FINDINGS : TB was detected in 11/49 (22.4%) of the 9/25 (36%) personal and 2/24 (8.3%) stationary samples. Samples from 5 of 10 doctors (50%) and 3 of 13 nurses (23%) were positive. Repeat measurements on different days showed variable results. Most of the HCWs (87.5%) with positive results had been in contact with coughing patients and had not worr respiratory masks despite been training. CONCLUSION : The use of air sampling coupled with real-time qPCR is a simple and effective tool to demonstrate the risk of TB exposure. The findings provide an impetus for hospital management to strengthen TB infection prevention and control measures.

Description

Keywords

Healthcare workers (HCWs), Infection prevention control, Occupational exposure, Air sampling, Polymerase chain reaction, Tuberculosis (TB), Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB)

Sustainable Development Goals

Citation

Matuka, O, Singh, TS, Bryce, E, Yassi, A, Kgasha, O, Zungu, M, Kyaw, K, Malotle, M, Renton, K & O'Hara, L 2015, 'Pilot study to detect airborne Mycobacterium tuberculosis exposure in a South African public healthcare facility outpatient clinic', Journal of Hospital Infection, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 192-196.