Part 2 : deferred tax 0%, 14.5% or 29%?
Loading...
Date
Authors
Venter, Elmar Retief
Von Well, Rieka
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
South African Institute of Chartered Accountants
Abstract
Recent circular issued by SAICA, Circular 1/2006, Disclosures in relation to deferred tax, recognizes that the debate surrounding paragraph 51 of IAS 12 (AC 102) has focused particularly on measuring deferred tax in relation to investment properties. The appropriate rate to be used to measure deferred tax is not an accounting policy choice. The rate should be determined based on the expected manner of recovery of the carrying amount of the asset. Secondly, the 14.5% rate is only appropriate, in the case of buildings, if it is expected that the carrying amount of the asset will be recovered through sale, and then only to fair value adjustments above the CGT valuation date value of the asset.
Description
Keywords
Deferred income taxes, Capital gains, Tax rates, Corporate income tax, International Accounting Standards Committee Statements, IAS 12, International accounting standards, Real estate, Investments
Sustainable Development Goals
Citation
Venter, E & Von Well, R 2006, 'Part 2: deferred tax 0%, 14.5% or 29%?', Accountancy SA, pp. 20-24. [http://www.accountancysa.org.za/]