Synthetic securitisation in South African law

Please be advised that the site will be down for maintenance on Sunday, September 1, 2024, from 08:00 to 18:00, and again on Monday, September 2, 2024, from 08:00 to 09:00. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Delport, P.A. (Piet A.) en
dc.contributor.postgraduate Wessels, Francois Claassens en
dc.date.accessioned 2016-06-14T09:45:25Z
dc.date.available 2016-06-14T09:45:25Z
dc.date.created 2016-04-14 en
dc.date.issued 2015 en
dc.description Thesis (LLD)--University of Pretoria, 2015. en
dc.description.abstract The objective of this thesis is to critically analyse synthetic securitisation schemes in South African law as synthetic collateralised debt obligations using primarily credit default swaps (CDSs). This transpires from the perspective of primarily company law, and secondarily securities law and the law of contract. It includes a contextualised study of these schemes with regards to their origins, their significance regarding the recent financial crisis, and their rationales micro-economic influence and Basel capital requirements. Not only are the participants, such as parties acting in a primary role and secondary role and special-purpose institutions, studied, but also the obligations between these parties, such as the CDS contract, and the meaning of commercial paper, the legal nature of credit-linked notes, the business of a bank, and the influence of recent case law. It also includes a consideration of synthetic securitisation schemes in terms of the Collective Investment Schemes Control Act 45 of 2002. Furthermore, the role of systemic risk and moral hazard is explained, as well as the interaction between synthetic securitisation schemes, credit rating agencies and the function of risk management. The CDS is compared with insurance contracts, and a discussion of the 2014 International Swaps and Derivatives Association Credit Derivative Definitions is incorporated. For legal comparison, the South African model is compared with Canadian law and its unfunded credit derivatives in the light of recent regulation, and compared to German law and its prevalence of funded credit derivatives. Finally, suggestions are made as to the future of synthetic securitisation schemes. en
dc.description.availability Unrestricted en
dc.description.degree LLD en
dc.description.department Mercantile Law en
dc.identifier.citation Wessels, FC 2016, Synthetic securitisation in South African law, LLD Thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/53208> en
dc.identifier.other A2016 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/53208
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher University of Pretoria en_ZA
dc.rights © 2016 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. en
dc.subject UCTD en
dc.subject.other Law theses SDG-17
dc.subject.other SDG-17: Partnerships for the goals
dc.title Synthetic securitisation in South African law en
dc.type Thesis en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record