An analysis of whether Pillar Three of the Responsibility to Protect doctrine obliges the Security Council to act in cases of mass atrocities such as those in Syria

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Tladi, Dire en
dc.contributor.postgraduate Kahama, Dickson en
dc.date.accessioned 2016-06-14T09:45:07Z
dc.date.available 2016-06-14T09:45:07Z
dc.date.created 2016-04-14 en
dc.date.issued 2015 en
dc.description Mini Dissertation (LLM)--University of Pretoria, 2015. en
dc.description.abstract For some time now, the problem of an inadequate response to the humanitarian crisis around the world to protect human populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity has persisted. It was against the significant legal difficulties, and challenges of humanitarian intervention as illustrated above, that it was argued that there was a need for an to efficient way to respond to the on-going humanitarian crises thus the introduction of the "Responsibility to Protect idea." The study has briefly touched on the creation, development and eventual adoption of the responsibility to protect (R2P) norm and more specifically. The purpose of this study is to critically examine the Nations Security Council's responsibility with regards to protection civilians from mass atrocities in light of the 2011 Syrian crisis. This is premised especially from pillar three of R2P which states that; "the international community has a responsibility to use appropriate diplomatic, humanitarian and other means to protect populations from these crimes. If a State is manifestly failing to protect its populations, the international community must be prepared to take collective action to protect populations, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations." The main question of this study is to analyse whether the responsibility to protect doctrine establishes a legal obligation on the United Nations Security Council to act in situations of mass atrocities such the case of Syria? The study has argued that much as the responsibility to protect doctrine neither establishes nor supports the idea that the Security Council is under a legal obligation to act when there is occurrence of humanitarian crisis, however, I have argued that article 24 together with other articles in the United Nations Charter create a legal obligation on the United Nations Security Council to act. en
dc.description.availability Unrestricted en
dc.description.degree LLM en
dc.description.department Public Law en
dc.identifier.citation Kahama, D 2016, An analysis of whether Pillar Three of the Responsibility to Protect doctrine obliges the Security Council to act in cases of mass atrocities such as those in Syria, LLM Mini Dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/53133> en
dc.identifier.other A2016 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/53133
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher University of Pretoria en_ZA
dc.rights © 2016 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. en
dc.subject UCTD en
dc.subject.other Law theses SDG-16 en
dc.subject.other SDG-16: Peace, justice and strong institutions en
dc.title An analysis of whether Pillar Three of the Responsibility to Protect doctrine obliges the Security Council to act in cases of mass atrocities such as those in Syria en
dc.type Mini Dissertation en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record