dc.contributor.author |
Cassim, Maleka Femida
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2016-05-06T14:33:18Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2016-05-06T14:33:18Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2008 |
|
dc.description |
This article was written by Maleka Femida Cassim before she joined the University of Pretoria. |
en_ZA |
dc.description.abstract |
The reverse triangular merger procedure is similar in structure to the
triangular merger, with the would-be acquirer, Company H, forming a
wholly-owned subsidiary, Company S, to act as the acquisition vehicle for the
merger with the target, Company T. The essential difference between the
triangular merger and the reverse triangular merger structure is that in the
former, Company T merges into Company S with Company S remaining in
existence as the surviving company, while in the latter it is Company T that is
the surviving company. Thus, paradoxically, the target company is the
surviving company in a reverse triangular merger and the acquiring company
disappears. |
en_ZA |
dc.description.department |
Mercantile Law |
en_ZA |
dc.description.librarian |
am2016 |
en_ZA |
dc.description.uri |
http://reference.sabinet.co.za/sa_epublication/ju_salj |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.citation |
Cassim, MF 2008, 'The introduction of the statutory merger in South African corporate law : majority rule offset by the appraisal right (Part 2)', South African Law Journal, pp. 147-176. |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn |
0258-2503 (print) |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1996-2177 (online) |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/52522 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_ZA |
dc.publisher |
Juta Law |
en_ZA |
dc.rights |
Juta Law |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Triangular merger |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Target company |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Surviving company |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Acquiring company |
en_ZA |
dc.title |
The introduction of the statutory merger in South African corporate law : majority rule offset by the appraisal right (Part 2) |
en_ZA |
dc.type |
Article |
en_ZA |