G.o.d. and the deus ex machina

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Reyburn, Duncan
dc.contributor.author Kirstein, Marno
dc.date.accessioned 2016-05-03T10:45:05Z
dc.date.available 2016-05-03T10:45:05Z
dc.date.issued 2015
dc.description.abstract This article explores the way that design ought to be narrated and legitimated within the context of the South African design industry. Special attention is given to the presence of disavowal in the design process, when clients commission designers to effect change for them, yet second-guess, mistrust, and scrutinise the proposed design solutions. Our grappling with this problem is done with reference to Nelson and Stolterman’s concept of the ‘guarantor of design’ or g.o.d. and the contexts and considerations that affect how this g.o.d. is selected, constructed, and deployed. Both practical and ideological factors are negotiated as ways to understand these contexts and considerations, and, thereafter, the significance of empathy is highlighted as a means to tackle the various disjunctions that tend to arise in the scripting of the drama of design. en_ZA
dc.description.department Visual Arts en_ZA
dc.description.librarian am2016 en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://www.imageandtext.up.ac.za en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Reyburn, D & Kirstein, M 2015, 'G.o.d. and the deus ex machina', Image and Text, no. 26, pp. 66-91. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 1020-1497
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/52239
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher University of Pretoria, Department of Visual Arts en_ZA
dc.rights University of Pretoria, Department of Visual Arts en_ZA
dc.subject Design research en_ZA
dc.subject Best practice en_ZA
dc.subject Client-designer relationship en_ZA
dc.subject Guarantor of design (g.o.d.) en_ZA
dc.subject Design and ideology en_ZA
dc.subject Empathy en_ZA
dc.title G.o.d. and the deus ex machina en_ZA
dc.type Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record