Structural completeness in relevance logics

dc.contributor.author	Raftery, James G.
dc.contributor.author	Swirydowicz, K.
dc.date.accessioned	2016-03-15T11:21:49Z
dc.date.issued	2016-06
dc.description.abstract	It is proved that the relevance logic R (without sentential constants) has no structurally complete consistent axiomatic extension, except for classical propositional logic. In fact, no other such extension is even passively structurally complete.	en_ZA
dc.description.embargo	2017-06-30
dc.description.librarian	hb2015	en_ZA
dc.description.uri	http://link.springer.com/journal/11225	en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation	Raftery, JG & Swirydowicz, K 2016, 'Structural completeness in relevance logics', Studia Logica, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 381-387.	en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn	0039-3215 (print)
dc.identifier.issn	1572-8730 (online)
dc.identifier.other	10.1007/s11225-015-9644-x
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/2263/51881
dc.language.iso	en	en_ZA
dc.publisher	Springer	en_ZA
dc.rights	© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015. The original publication is available at : http://link.springer.com/journal/11225.	en_ZA
dc.subject	Sentential formulas	en_ZA
dc.subject	Algebraic signature	en_ZA
dc.subject	Structurally complete	en_ZA
dc.subject	Admissible rule	en_ZA
dc.subject	Structurally complete	en_ZA
dc.subject	Relevance logic	en_ZA
dc.title	Structural completeness in relevance logics	en_ZA
dc.type	Postprint Article	en_ZA