Effect of diets differing in rumen soluble nitrogen on utilization of poor-quality roughage by sheep

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mentz, A.M.
dc.contributor.author Van Niekerk, Willem A.
dc.contributor.author Hassen, Abubeker
dc.contributor.author Coertze, R.J. (Roelof Johannes)
dc.contributor.author Gemeda, B.S. (Belete Shenkute)
dc.date.accessioned 2016-03-04T06:17:42Z
dc.date.available 2016-03-04T06:17:42Z
dc.date.issued 2015-12-14
dc.description.abstract This study investigated the effects of replacing rapid-release nitrogen (N) from urea with a graded level of slow-release N (Optigen® II) source on intake, digestibility, rumen fermentation and microbial protein synthesis, when sheep were fed a poor-quality roughage diet. Five rumen cannulated wethers were used in a 5 x 5 Latin square experimental design. The treatments had various proportions of urea to Optigen® II (0 : 100, 25 : 75, 50 : 50, 75 : 25 and 100 : 0), with the same inclusion level of starch and a mineral premix on an iso-nitrogen basis. The 25% urea : 75% Optigen® II treatment showed significantly higher intakes of dry matter, organic matter, neutral detergent fibre and digestible organic matter than in the other treatments. No differences were recorded for apparent dry matter digestibility, organic matter digestibility and neutral detergent fibre digestibility among the treatments. However, sheep on the 100% Optigen® II treatment had a significantly lower apparent nitrogen digestibility. No differences were observed for ruminal pH and volatile fatty acid concentrations among the treatments, except for butyrate and isobutyrate concentrations. The butyrate concentration of the 100% Optigen® II treatment was significantly lower than the other treatments, whereas the isobutyrate concentration was significantly lower than in Treatments 2 (75% urea : 25% Optigen® II) and 5 (100% Optigen® II). The rumen NH3-N concentration of the 100% Optigen® II treatment was significantly lower than the 100% urea treatment at two and four hours after infusion. Based on biological responses, results suggest that up to 75% of urea could be replaced with Optigen® II in supplements. en_ZA
dc.description.librarian am2015 en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorship The Protein Research Foundation, Feedtek, NRF and IFS grant. en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://www.sasas.co.za en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Mentz, AM, Van Niekerk, WA, Hassen, A, Coertze, RJ & Gemeda, BS 2015, 'Effect of diets differing in rumen soluble nitrogen on utilization of poor-quality roughage by sheep', South African Journal of Animal Science, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 528-537. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 0375-1589 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 2221-4062 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.4314/sajas.v45i5.10
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/51684
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher South African Society for Animal Science en_ZA
dc.rights Copyright resides with the authors in terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 South African Licence. en_ZA
dc.subject Digestibility en_ZA
dc.subject Intake en_ZA
dc.subject Optigen® II en_ZA
dc.subject Non-protein nitrogen en_ZA
dc.subject Rumen ammonia nitrogen en_ZA
dc.title Effect of diets differing in rumen soluble nitrogen on utilization of poor-quality roughage by sheep en_ZA
dc.type Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record