Abstract:
The role of behavioural science (BSE) in proving the occurrence of child sexual abuse
(CSA) is well documented. Equally, its role in placing the evidence of the CSA victim
into proper perspective is undisputable. South Africa stands out as one of the very few
or perhaps the only criminal justice system in Africa which has over the years admitted
BSE in CSA prosecutions. This potentially makes it a source of good practice for many
criminal justice systems in Africa and the world over. Despite the many years of
admitting BSE in CSA prosecutions, little is known about the critical role it has played
thus far, the gaps in the courts’ current approach to BSE and how these gaps can be
addressed. The present article, with reference to selected recent case law from South
Africa and comparative case law from America, analyses the critical role of BSE in
affording broader redress to CSA victims. The article identifies the gaps in the current
approach of the courts in South Africa. Drawing from the approach of selected courts
in America, it suggests additional reforms which may be relevant if the potential of BSE
in CSA prosecutions is to be fully and appropriately exploited.
